Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2381088, member: 1892&quot;]Well, 48 shares an obverse with 10 and 93, and a reverse with 60, 61 and 99, so you&#039;re not seeing things. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s definitely a Large S reverse. I just can&#039;t see any of the date doubling which is <b>imperative</b> to attributing 1880-S in these images. I see stuff in DOLLAR (and maybe IGWT), but that&#039;s about it and that could be MD. We need the date much closer - bet you can do that, Alan <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> - to have a chance at this one. Don&#039;t forget, the pullaway toning is going to deceive you regarding doubling.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in