Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rhoggman, post: 397958, member: 13987&quot;]PCGS was started by dealers while they were still selling....</p><p><br /></p><p>Everybody talks about buying the coin, and not the holder, but it seems people really do rely on the holder more than themselves. Otherwise the conflict of interest would not be seen as so big a &quot;risk&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyways, if DGS doesn&#039;t stay honest they have 2 companies to lose... DLRC &amp; DGS, so they have a huge incentive to deliver a great product. Furthermore they are giving the public a FREE way to keep them honest. </p><p><br /></p><p>The Visual Population report would kill them quicker than a conflict of interest. If they do a crappy job, they made a terrible decision to show it to the world.</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally I think they will rank #3 in the TPG world very quickly as ANACS is not going to be hard to push out of he way. If their grading is superior to PCGS &amp; NGC it will also be available for everyone to see. </p><p><br /></p><p>NGC &amp; PCGS couls start a visual pop report, but they are at a hude disadvantage for not having it since the beginning. That wuld be one hell of a massive reholder program.</p><p><br /></p><p>Furthermore the signature series grading will create an entirely new market for high quality coins if they can get the right experts on hand.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in