Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;foundinrolls, post: 111367, member: 4350&quot;]On the 56 D, nothing exceptional .&nbsp; Mintmarks were punched in by hand then and can be in a number of locations. </p><p><br /></p><p>on the 1960 D,&nbsp; it is possible that it is a worn example ofan RPM. there seems to be a D above the D that is there, if you look closely at the pic. The D is not in the correct position for it to be one of the 1960 D small over large date cents</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1993 is a die chip</p><p><br /></p><p>the 1969 S is mechanical doubling (very slight) also visible on the date</p><p><br /></p><p>I can only hazard a guess on the 1969 D because of all the damage, but it looks like the D was damaged and the metal retained.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in