Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Opinions on this "war relic" coin with embedded bullet
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2957207, member: 112"]So have I, probably a whole lot more of them than you have seeing as how I started doing it in the 1960's. And yeah they went through the coins in almost every case. BUT - that was with modern ammo. </p><p><br /></p><p>My sole point is this, old ammo, had one heck of lot less power than modern ammo. And it was extremely common for old ammo, even with what was considered to be a high powered rifle at the time - not to penetrate a coin. The bullets were different back then, the powder was extremely different (as in far less powerful), and the guns themselves were different.</p><p><br /></p><p>Think of the case of Lt. George Dixon whose life was saved when he was shot and the bullet only put a dent the coin, a $20 double eagle, and it was not much of a dent ! That coin still exist today. That took place in the Civil War, and yes, by 1900 bullets and guns were different by 1900. But they still didn't have much more power or penetration that they did in the Civil War. In many cases, many bullets around 1900 were still black powder loads. But even smokeless powder back then was a completely different animal than it is today - with but a fraction of the power of modern ammo.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is it possible that was a fake ? Yes. But it is also possible, and even far more likely, that it was completely genuine.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2957207, member: 112"]So have I, probably a whole lot more of them than you have seeing as how I started doing it in the 1960's. And yeah they went through the coins in almost every case. BUT - that was with modern ammo. My sole point is this, old ammo, had one heck of lot less power than modern ammo. And it was extremely common for old ammo, even with what was considered to be a high powered rifle at the time - not to penetrate a coin. The bullets were different back then, the powder was extremely different (as in far less powerful), and the guns themselves were different. Think of the case of Lt. George Dixon whose life was saved when he was shot and the bullet only put a dent the coin, a $20 double eagle, and it was not much of a dent ! That coin still exist today. That took place in the Civil War, and yes, by 1900 bullets and guns were different by 1900. But they still didn't have much more power or penetration that they did in the Civil War. In many cases, many bullets around 1900 were still black powder loads. But even smokeless powder back then was a completely different animal than it is today - with but a fraction of the power of modern ammo. Is it possible that was a fake ? Yes. But it is also possible, and even far more likely, that it was completely genuine.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Opinions on this "war relic" coin with embedded bullet
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...