Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Owle, post: 1885000, member: 22004&quot;]I just disagree with you on the Seated half, the coin has a ton of eye appeal a little brushiness in the fields.&nbsp; The stigmatization of good coins is damaging to the hobby.&nbsp; If you instead demanded that coins that are high value need to adhere to stricter standards than all well and good.&nbsp; To be overly critical on under $500 coins is just petty.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I have bought and sold a fair amount of Seated material and attractive or original toning is appealing to many collectors not to all.&nbsp; And I have had Seated material that takes forever to sell because frankly they are usually slow movers.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you think that NGC/NCS are always right how about this:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.coinlink.com/News/images/Vermuele_93S_Morgan_pvgsHolder.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><img src="http://dyn2.heritagestatic.com/lf?set=path%5B3%2F7%2F3%2F2%2F3732655%5D%2Csizedata%5B220x350%5D&amp;call=url%5Bfile%3Aproduct.chain%5D" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>Quite an improvement, eh?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in