Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jim Johns, post: 2532080, member: 78172&quot;]You&#039;re probably right and I completely respect that opinion, but I may chance it with the 1946 after comparing to some of the MS67&#039;s on HA. I&#039;ve never seen an MS67 1946 in hand but it may get there with the in hand luster and toning on mine. If not I&#039;ll break even considering I technically got this one for free. You guys know a lot more and I&#039;m not arguing a likely 66 on it, but there&#039;s still a decent premium on an MS66 with equal toning too.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in