Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 1005238, member: 19463&quot;]It is a matter of opinion.&nbsp; I like coin 2 because of the eye appeal despite being the more common, later version.&nbsp; It is nicer for its type than the other two are but should be cheaper than #3 because of the size. I also like coin 3 because it is the larger, earlier version (as is 1) but has decent surfaces.&nbsp; #1 is polished and would be my last choice.&nbsp; I&#039;m a cheapskate and consider any of the three overpriced at $50.&nbsp; All three are Cyzicus mint.&nbsp; It is generally easier to find a nice FH from Antioch and I&#039;d suggest that if you are going to have just one. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>RaceBannon&#039;s coin is nice suffering only from being part legend in the mintmark (still attributable).&nbsp; The ruler is Constantius Gallus rather than Constantius II and it bothers me that the holder does not list this difference.&nbsp; IMHO this one is worth about the $40 quoted.&nbsp; If the legends were on the flan completely, it would be worth more.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in