Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Pavlos, post: 3301866, member: 96635&quot;]First of all thank you everyone yet again for the valuable opinions and advices.</p><p><br /></p><p>I gladly take your advice and I decided to take neither. Eventhough I really like the coin type and #2 seems ideal, the head keeps bothering me and I am sure it will keep bothering me even in 10 years. #1 has an amazing head but the detail of everything else is really lacking. After all it is 210 and 170 dollars, it is still quite a lot of money. I hope that in the near future I will find a #2 with a face #1 even if it cost me 50 dollars more, atleast I have a coin I am happy to own then. I am not in a hurry, it is a hobby not a business after all.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you all!</p><p><br /></p><p>I did get this Thasos diobol which looks amazing in my opinion, a very artistic obverse, this will keep me satisfied from not having a Chios drachm (yet) <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/csunVms.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>Thasos AR Diobol. Circa 510-480 BC. </b></p><p><b>Obverse: </b>Satyr running right.</p><p><b>Reverse: </b>Quadripartite incuse square.</p><p>0.82g; 12mm</p><p><br /></p><p>It has a really interesting design compared to other examples I have seen, it looks like the hulk from the Satyrs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in