Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;National dealer, post: 11466, member: 487&quot;]I can&#039;t seem to get the detail when I upload this photo. Since our site is currently down, I can&#039;t link from there to here. </p><p>The doubling on this coin appears to be along the lines of class 2 doubling. The first three digits of the date spreading towards the rim. </p><p><br /></p><p>Like I said, I am not positive about this coin. Since the only referrences I can find do not match this coin, I am kind of at a loss. Earlier in this thread I mentioned that this particular die used to create this coin could have been polished and the date repunched. I just can&#039;t justify that thought though. The punch would have to have had 3 digits. That just doesn&#039;t add up. If all four digits or two would have been out of line, that would make more sense. Many early punches used were single or double digit. </p><p>No other doubling appears on any other area of the coin. Some of the more obscure doublings for this date all exhibit something more than just these three digits. </p><p><br /></p><p>In the end, it could boil down to a worn die. I will have to have some others look at the coin. Maybe I am just missing something. </p><p><br /></p><p>Drop me an email with your address and I will ship the coin up to you for your opinion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in