Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2123266, member: 19463&quot;]Are we safe in assuming that 2015 definitions of beauty held true in the time these coins were made?&nbsp; Do we know that small, delicate features were more valued then than a strong chiseled look?&nbsp; In my lifetime, female beauties have become less well padded and more athletic.&nbsp; Along the way we passed through a period where emaciated was in.&nbsp; What textual references do we have on which empresses were considered great beauties and which were desirable for other features (daughter of a powerful family, e.g.)?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in