Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 2032626, member: 27832&quot;]&quot;Common date&quot;, yeah -- but in <b>68PL</b>? Heh.</p><p><br /></p><p>Do you suppose it would still maintain DMPL by today&#039;s standards? I got a bit of a lesson when I tried to sell an old-holder PL common date -- I hadn&#039;t realized that the standards for PL and DMPL were actually <i>less</i> strict on the old holders.</p><p><br /></p><p>If it <i>does</i> meet today&#039;s standards for DMPL, and if the seller can make the case that &quot;older slabs are often undergraded relative to current slabs&quot;, I can see why the seller would ask high.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, that cheek scuff really grabs the attention in this photo. And I notice there&#039;s no green bean. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in