Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 2417100, member: 24314&quot;]I&#039;ll check on that mark when I get my coin in hand and post the article.&nbsp; Until then, you&#039;ll be able to read for yourself:</p><p><br /></p><p>After the authenticators returned one coin to a major dealer as a counterfeit, he sent an employee to the Smithsonian to compare the piece to a genuine example in the National Collection.&nbsp; The numismatist as able to match die polish on the genuine coin with the ANACS example.&nbsp; Soon after, the NY dealer claimed the coin that ANACS called counterfeit was really genuine.&nbsp; In spite of this, the ANACS authenticators were able to prove the &quot;Omega&quot; coins were counterfeit due to die defects on the coins.&nbsp; So way back in 1972, the transfer process was advanced enough to produce great looking, detailed fake coins!&nbsp; The fakes of today are much better.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in