Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Old PCGS Grading Is Terrible
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 5124841, member: 24314"]baseball21, posted: "Even if you say [<i><span style="color: #b30059">What I say means nothing and will not change anything. I'm just stating provable FACT because as you stated, I was there. I claim to be the "author" of "the true (not used by the ANA in CO) technical grading system." and I was around to see it made obsolete by the commercial TPG's. There is no right or wrong in this. The market made a choice to go with a system based on VALUE. That way, grading was no longer simple and precise and the majority of us came under the control of knowledgeable dealers. They know the fluctuating market value of coins. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></i>] value or subjective measures have no place in grading, grading standards were still different in the 1950s than they were in the 1890s. They have always been changing over time as I'm sure you know, it's easiest to explain that way as some people end up getting confused and think the changes are just a function of the TPGs. <span style="color: #b30059"><i>["True" technical grading only assessed the condition of preservation of a coin from its as struck appearance. It was precise and did not change over time or economic conditions. All changes in grading (including removing the MS line) have occurred due to the control of the TPGS and increases in the value of coins.]</i></span> </p><p><br /></p><p>GoldFinger1969, posted: "<i>I take it that graders are aware of key "inflection points" where price/value increases a ton, right ?" </i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #b30059">Yes, most of them who were successful coin dealers at one time. </span></i></p><p><br /></p><p>Pickin and Grinin, posted: "...<b><span style="color: #b30000">The changes [<i>in grading standards</i>]"ARE" a function of the TPG's. The collector did not ask for market grading. They did not ask for a clearly AU coin to be graded as uncirculated. We did not create the slider market."<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></b></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="6">AMEN! </font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 5124841, member: 24314"]baseball21, posted: "Even if you say [[I][COLOR=#b30059]What I say means nothing and will not change anything. I'm just stating provable FACT because as you stated, I was there. I claim to be the "author" of "the true (not used by the ANA in CO) technical grading system." and I was around to see it made obsolete by the commercial TPG's. There is no right or wrong in this. The market made a choice to go with a system based on VALUE. That way, grading was no longer simple and precise and the majority of us came under the control of knowledgeable dealers. They know the fluctuating market value of coins. ;)[/COLOR][/I]] value or subjective measures have no place in grading, grading standards were still different in the 1950s than they were in the 1890s. They have always been changing over time as I'm sure you know, it's easiest to explain that way as some people end up getting confused and think the changes are just a function of the TPGs. [COLOR=#b30059][I]["True" technical grading only assessed the condition of preservation of a coin from its as struck appearance. It was precise and did not change over time or economic conditions. All changes in grading (including removing the MS line) have occurred due to the control of the TPGS and increases in the value of coins.][/I][/COLOR] GoldFinger1969, posted: "[I]I take it that graders are aware of key "inflection points" where price/value increases a ton, right ?" [COLOR=#b30059]Yes, most of them who were successful coin dealers at one time. [/COLOR][/I] Pickin and Grinin, posted: "...[B][COLOR=#b30000]The changes [[I]in grading standards[/I]]"ARE" a function of the TPG's. The collector did not ask for market grading. They did not ask for a clearly AU coin to be graded as uncirculated. We did not create the slider market.":cigar::bookworm:[/COLOR][/B] [SIZE=6]AMEN! [/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Old PCGS Grading Is Terrible
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...