Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ToughCOINS, post: 2825573, member: 20480&quot;]Okay, I need more unbiased eyes than just my own to decide if what I think is really true.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve found photos of a couple of other 1926-D quarters with similar die breaks and cracks, and they&#039;ve always looked so much alike to me that I assumed they were all necessarily identical.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you&#039;ve got the time, please have a look at each, and especially the length of the rim cud, and let me know how you think they compare with mine.&nbsp; Are they exactly the same, or do they differ?</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/27153147_36065497_max.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/27153147_36065497_max.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/27153147_36065497_max.jpg</a></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/11373710_1411664_max.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/11373710_1411664_max.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/11373710_1411664_max.jpg</a></p><p><br /></p><p>To me, it appears that the rim cud on the second linked coin is smaller than that on mine and on the first linked coin.&nbsp; If that&#039;s the case, then if the coins were all struck by the same obverse die, the die break started smaller, and gradually increased in size as more bits broke off.&nbsp; This tells me it is not plausible that a single die chip large enough to transfer the details in question could have come off of the die.&nbsp; Have I lost you yet?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in