Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Valentinian, post: 7651480, member: 44316&quot;]&quot;suspicious..Lots 108, 109, 112, 116, 121,125, 129, 180, 184, 188..&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>I looked into a few of the pedigrees given in the Lansky auction. I have a lot of old auction catalogs and was able to look some up. They are all as stated. This is strong evidence that the coins are genuine.</p><p><br /></p><p>Lot 109 really is NGC 4787403-001, as asserted.</p><p>Lot 110, a Tiberius denarius, really is Numismatica Ars Classica 1989 (1) lot 791, as asserted..</p><p>Lansky lot 112, a Nero as, really is Frank Sternberg 1986 (18) lot 428, as asserted.</p><p>Lot 125 really is Tradart 1993 (3) lot 232, as asserted.</p><p>Lot 129 really is Tradart 1992 (2) lot 200, as asserted.</p><p>Lot 180, really is Bankhaus Hauck &amp; Aufhäuser 1988 (5) lot 514, as asserted.</p><p>lot 184 really is Adolph Hess &amp; Bank Leu 1969 (41) lot 600, as asserted.</p><p>Lot 188 really is Bankhaus Hauck &amp; Aufhäuser 1998 (14) lot 521, as asserted.</p><p><br /></p><p>Lot 116 was &quot;Acquired from TradArt&quot; and not asserted to be in a particular catalog. For those of you who don&#039;t know, TradArt was a firm with very high-end coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in