Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RickieB, post: 116853, member: 2486&quot;]Doug...when you fall off the boat, man you really fall in deep water huh? Those your coins? LOL</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie6" alt=":cool:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>RickieB</p><p><br /></p><p>What I can see on all the coins is the fact that each coin is in MS condition (I think there was 1 Prf but not sure) each coin has&nbsp; it&#039;s own appeal. The level of tick marks, swipes, and other distraction were minimum to normal for the Morgans...I am by no means a pro grader but there was&nbsp; the 1883 CC Morgan (3rd one pictured) WOWZER! I am a dog bitting on the bone with that one..66 all the way! I think the point that you are trying to make is that even with slight differences, everyone will have their own opinion? That is what makes it tough to grade on an accurate basis..therefore leading the way to reform for proper grading is never going to occur...too many opinions out there on what is and what is not..This&nbsp; is just my take on the post..right or wrong..thats why I am a collector, not a grader. I would happily be proud to own any of those beauties...</p><p><br /></p><p>RickieB[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in