Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Ok. How do many think a coin value dips because the cleaning of a coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1625518, member: 112"]Slider - </p><p><br /></p><p>Your comments are a perfect example of an issue that I have often talked about. That is the improper use, improper use in my opinion anyway, of the term "cleaned". Based on your comments quoted above there is a distinct difference between what "cleaned" means, and what "harshly cleaned" means. Personally, I agree with you, there is a distinct difference between those two terms. To me just because a coin has been cleaned that does not mean that it has been harshly cleaned.</p><p><br /></p><p>But most people don't see it that way. When discussing coins if somebody uses the term "cleaned", what they really mean is "harshly cleaned". To most people those two terms mean exactly the same thing. "Improperly cleaned" also means exactly the same thing that "harshly cleaned" means.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, it seems that you think that when NGC or PCGS label a coin with what you call the "improper" code, you think that means that the coin has been "cleaned" but not "harshly cleaned". </p><p><br /></p><p>However, that is not the case. If NGC or PCGS puts "Cleaned" on the slab label, that means that the coin has been harshly cleaned. Here is the PCGS definition of what you call the "improper code", code 92 in other words.</p><p><br /></p><p>92|N-2 Cleaned – surface damage due to a harsh, abrasive cleaning</p><p><br /></p><p>Unfortunately it seems that the numismatic community is stuck with the improper use of the two terms. And I can't see it ever changing. Once people get in the habit of doing something they rarely if ever change.</p><p><br /></p><p>So it is doubly important that when you see the term "cleaned" being used, you realize that what it really means is "harshly cleaned".</p><p><br /></p><p>As to your question regarding the value of "harshly cleaned" coins, there is no rule of thumb. Values can bounce all over the place based on the opinion of the potential buyer. But in any case the value of "harshly cleaned" coin is always going to be less, and often considerably less, than the value of a comparable problem free example. </p><p><br /></p><p>You yourself are a good example of this for based on your comments you have bought many "harshly cleaned" coins because you misunderstood the use of the term "cleaned" on the label. Thinking that these coins were not damaged as much as if they had been labeled "harshly cleaned". So perhaps you paid too much for those coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1625518, member: 112"]Slider - Your comments are a perfect example of an issue that I have often talked about. That is the improper use, improper use in my opinion anyway, of the term "cleaned". Based on your comments quoted above there is a distinct difference between what "cleaned" means, and what "harshly cleaned" means. Personally, I agree with you, there is a distinct difference between those two terms. To me just because a coin has been cleaned that does not mean that it has been harshly cleaned. But most people don't see it that way. When discussing coins if somebody uses the term "cleaned", what they really mean is "harshly cleaned". To most people those two terms mean exactly the same thing. "Improperly cleaned" also means exactly the same thing that "harshly cleaned" means. Also, it seems that you think that when NGC or PCGS label a coin with what you call the "improper" code, you think that means that the coin has been "cleaned" but not "harshly cleaned". However, that is not the case. If NGC or PCGS puts "Cleaned" on the slab label, that means that the coin has been harshly cleaned. Here is the PCGS definition of what you call the "improper code", code 92 in other words. 92|N-2 Cleaned – surface damage due to a harsh, abrasive cleaning Unfortunately it seems that the numismatic community is stuck with the improper use of the two terms. And I can't see it ever changing. Once people get in the habit of doing something they rarely if ever change. So it is doubly important that when you see the term "cleaned" being used, you realize that what it really means is "harshly cleaned". As to your question regarding the value of "harshly cleaned" coins, there is no rule of thumb. Values can bounce all over the place based on the opinion of the potential buyer. But in any case the value of "harshly cleaned" coin is always going to be less, and often considerably less, than the value of a comparable problem free example. You yourself are a good example of this for based on your comments you have bought many "harshly cleaned" coins because you misunderstood the use of the term "cleaned" on the label. Thinking that these coins were not damaged as much as if they had been labeled "harshly cleaned". So perhaps you paid too much for those coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Ok. How do many think a coin value dips because the cleaning of a coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...