Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrweaseluv, post: 7286331, member: 40340&quot;]Ok here we go... Might be a lil surprise in this reveal <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>1881s as Morgandude said... very conservatily graded.. though not in hand the pics really seem good enough to call it MS65 PL but no.. MS64, but got a very good price on it <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1275872[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>And here is the big surprise, I also think slightly undergraded I&#039;d say 62-63 but NGC say MS61 PL... and again the price was right <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>My one question to morgandude is this... why is this one PL and not the 81, I thought the reflectivness of the fields determined pl/dpl... Or is the 81 just as you said over conservative? (PS good call ddddd)</p><p>&nbsp; [ATTACH=full]1275873[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in