Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
ohm meter to test for real from fake siler
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="calcol, post: 2786262, member: 77639"]As Doug mentioned, checking physical characteristics of the metal won't distinguish genuine from fake coins cast or struck from the "real stuff". Even sophisticated metal analysis, like XRF which gives a trace metal readout, won't work if original metal is used, e.g. striking fake 1889CC Morgans from metal obtained from cheaper, worn CC Morgans. So, physical characteristics are useful for detecting wrong-metal fakes only.</p><p><br /></p><p>Electrical characteristics, like resistance, capacitance, inductance, are among the worst physical measurements to use to evaluate the metals in coins for several reasons. As has been mentioned, these characteristics don't differ a lot among metals used in coins (copper, silver, nickel, gold, etc.), so very expensive test gear would be needed. It was also mentioned that the test leads have to have a very good attachment to the DUT (device under test aka coin), which means the oxide (or sulfide or carbonate or ...) layer has to be pierced. Tough to do that without damaging the coin. Finally, electrical characteristics are dependent on geometry. The resistance of a coin in the 6-12 digit accuracy needed to distinguish metallic composition would be influenced by seemingly minor variations in surface contamination, wear, strike, diameter and thickness. Positioning of the test leads would be critical too.</p><p><br /></p><p>Variation in distribution of metals within a coin would affect resistance even if the overall composition was identical. As an extreme example, imagine two coins that are 90% copper and 10% silver. In one coin, the silver is all in a disc in the middle. In the other coin, the silver is all in a ring that runs around the periphery of the coin. If you attach the test leads to the edges of the coins, the resistance of the latter coin would measure less than the former.</p><p><br /></p><p>Better physical methods for metal analysis range from the simple like specific gravity and magnetic characteristics to sophisticated like XRF, ultrasound transmission, x-ray / gamma-ray absorption, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>Cal[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="calcol, post: 2786262, member: 77639"]As Doug mentioned, checking physical characteristics of the metal won't distinguish genuine from fake coins cast or struck from the "real stuff". Even sophisticated metal analysis, like XRF which gives a trace metal readout, won't work if original metal is used, e.g. striking fake 1889CC Morgans from metal obtained from cheaper, worn CC Morgans. So, physical characteristics are useful for detecting wrong-metal fakes only. Electrical characteristics, like resistance, capacitance, inductance, are among the worst physical measurements to use to evaluate the metals in coins for several reasons. As has been mentioned, these characteristics don't differ a lot among metals used in coins (copper, silver, nickel, gold, etc.), so very expensive test gear would be needed. It was also mentioned that the test leads have to have a very good attachment to the DUT (device under test aka coin), which means the oxide (or sulfide or carbonate or ...) layer has to be pierced. Tough to do that without damaging the coin. Finally, electrical characteristics are dependent on geometry. The resistance of a coin in the 6-12 digit accuracy needed to distinguish metallic composition would be influenced by seemingly minor variations in surface contamination, wear, strike, diameter and thickness. Positioning of the test leads would be critical too. Variation in distribution of metals within a coin would affect resistance even if the overall composition was identical. As an extreme example, imagine two coins that are 90% copper and 10% silver. In one coin, the silver is all in a disc in the middle. In the other coin, the silver is all in a ring that runs around the periphery of the coin. If you attach the test leads to the edges of the coins, the resistance of the latter coin would measure less than the former. Better physical methods for metal analysis range from the simple like specific gravity and magnetic characteristics to sophisticated like XRF, ultrasound transmission, x-ray / gamma-ray absorption, etc. Cal[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
ohm meter to test for real from fake siler
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...