Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Officina vs. no officina mark on early Gothicus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="seth77, post: 2258679, member: 56653"]To Mr. Mairat Smyrna is what RIC refers to as "Asian mint" for Gallienus. Sometime before mid 269 the mint was moved to Cyzicus which is marked by the appearance of new types like his famous VICTORIAE GOTHIC. These new types show some of the distinctive features seen at Smyrna like the features of the portrait, the long obv. legend and an overall heavier flan, for a few months (referred to as Phase 1 Cyzicus), before developing into a new style that breaks away from the Smyrna tradition (Phase 2 Cyzicus).</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are 2 examples to show the evolution of Cyzicus style from Smyrna-influenced to its own separate style:</p><p><br /></p><p>Cyzicus Phase 1 (mid-end 269):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]448224[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Please note the bust features and most importantly the long legend IMP C M AVR CLAVDIVS AVG (AE23mm 3.93g)</p><p><br /></p><p>VS.</p><p><br /></p><p>Cyzicus Phase 2 (late 269 or more likely early to mid 270):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]448225[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>A new portrait style, short legend IMP CLAVDIVS PF AVG and lower weight and die diameter at AE19mm 2.38g.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="seth77, post: 2258679, member: 56653"]To Mr. Mairat Smyrna is what RIC refers to as "Asian mint" for Gallienus. Sometime before mid 269 the mint was moved to Cyzicus which is marked by the appearance of new types like his famous VICTORIAE GOTHIC. These new types show some of the distinctive features seen at Smyrna like the features of the portrait, the long obv. legend and an overall heavier flan, for a few months (referred to as Phase 1 Cyzicus), before developing into a new style that breaks away from the Smyrna tradition (Phase 2 Cyzicus). Here are 2 examples to show the evolution of Cyzicus style from Smyrna-influenced to its own separate style: Cyzicus Phase 1 (mid-end 269): [ATTACH=full]448224[/ATTACH] Please note the bust features and most importantly the long legend IMP C M AVR CLAVDIVS AVG (AE23mm 3.93g) VS. Cyzicus Phase 2 (late 269 or more likely early to mid 270): [ATTACH=full]448225[/ATTACH] A new portrait style, short legend IMP CLAVDIVS PF AVG and lower weight and die diameter at AE19mm 2.38g.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Officina vs. no officina mark on early Gothicus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...