NY Times

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Suarez, Jan 12, 2021.

  1. Suarez

    Suarez Well-Known Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. Limes

    Limes Supporter! Supporter

    I almost thought that archeologists found a Roman water pipe in New York :)

    Well, yes, to do that makes one an old .... :D:p

    No, just kidding, it's a good thing to do in this instance! And thanks for the interesting read.
  4. shanxi

    shanxi Well-Known Member

    Novo Eboracum ? ;)
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2021
    +VGO.DVCKS, Limes and FitzNigel like this.
  5. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member Supporter

    I might suggest sending a fan letter to the author personally rather than the paper. Start with praise for the article and mention that you regret the inclusion of an error. He is interesting enough to have a Wikipedia page. It might well turn out that he is not responsible for the error since the photo caption might have been added by a underling staffer.
    Restitutor likes this.
  6. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Really? I find I could write a letter to the editor on about 85% of the articles in the NYT. Seems like the paper is simply one large Opinion section nowadays, real facts are fairly scarce or twisted up so severely they are barely recognizable.
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2021
    PlanoSteve and Silphium Addict like this.
  7. Nicholas Molinari

    Nicholas Molinari Well-Known Member

  8. jamesicus

    jamesicus Supporter! Supporter

    Excellent, @Suarez - thank you for doing that!
    +VGO.DVCKS and Nicholas Molinari like this.
  9. PlanoSteve

    PlanoSteve Supporter! Supporter

    Interesting read, including this:

    Mary Beard, a professor of classics at Cambridge University, posited that while Caligula might have been assassinated because he was a monster, it is equally possible that he was made into a monster because he was assassinated. In “SPQR,” her rich history of ancient Rome, she argues that “it is hard to resist the conclusion that, whatever kernel of truth they might have, the stories told about him are an inextricable mixture of fact, exaggeration, willful misinterpretation and outright invention — largely constructed after his death, and largely for the benefit of the new emperor, Claudius.”

    Restitutor likes this.
  10. Amit Vyas

    Amit Vyas Well-Known Member

    I had once written to the National Museum, New Delhi, pointing out that a breast-plate in their collection, which reportedly belonged to the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb had the emperor’s name (in Persian) clearly mis-spelt as “Rorangzeb” (which, to me, casts some doubt on the authenticity of the piece). Never recieved a reply, though the piece no longer features in the online gallery on their website.
    DonnaML and Alegandron like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page