Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Numismatography
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Larry Moran, post: 820064, member: 4580"]<b>Direct lighting and axial lighting</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks, for responding, folks. It's nice to see a few postings already. : )</p><p><br /></p><p>While it's true that photos should look exactly like coins look in hand, there is an additional fact involved. The photographer's lighting may not be the same as a buyer's, so when the buyer examines a coin, they may see something a bit different from listing photos.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example, if a buyer examines a coin while tipping it toward the light, they may see more toning or iridescence than appeared in listing photos. If I were to sell a coin with great toning, I have two ways of emphasizing its toning...</p><p><br /></p><p>• I could photograph the coin at an angle so it reflects the lighting. The problem with photographing coins at an angle is that it is difficult to get all of the coin in sharp focus, given the limitations of depth-of-field inherent with macro lenses, or the macro setting available on some point-and-shot cameras.</p><p><br /></p><p>• I can use axial lighting which allows me to photograph the coin straight-on. Axial lighting brings out toning better than direct room lighting.</p><p><br /></p><p>If I were to sell a coin and use axial lighting, I would <u>also</u> provide photos taken in direct lighting. That way, the buyer will likely see both views and their impressions from seeing the listing photos will be confirmed. Coins certainly do not appear the same in all lighting. : )</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's an example, and both methods of lighting reflect the 'truth,' but they certainly have different appearances. These are unretouched images of my Conder Token.</p><p><br /></p><p><u>Normal lighting</u></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/KellysDirectLighting2-up.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><u>Axial lighting</u></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/KellysConderToken2-up1024.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Since <u>beautifully toned coins can sell at 2-30 times book value,</u> I think it's important to show the toning as well as possible in listing photos. In good photos, natural toning will generally be obvious and appear far different from artificially toned coins. Numismatography can help one learn a lot about toning. I believe that someday eye appeal will surpass rarity as the key to value. Digital cameras and the internet are making that begin to happen already. ; )[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Larry Moran, post: 820064, member: 4580"][b]Direct lighting and axial lighting[/b] Thanks, for responding, folks. It's nice to see a few postings already. : ) While it's true that photos should look exactly like coins look in hand, there is an additional fact involved. The photographer's lighting may not be the same as a buyer's, so when the buyer examines a coin, they may see something a bit different from listing photos. For example, if a buyer examines a coin while tipping it toward the light, they may see more toning or iridescence than appeared in listing photos. If I were to sell a coin with great toning, I have two ways of emphasizing its toning... • I could photograph the coin at an angle so it reflects the lighting. The problem with photographing coins at an angle is that it is difficult to get all of the coin in sharp focus, given the limitations of depth-of-field inherent with macro lenses, or the macro setting available on some point-and-shot cameras. • I can use axial lighting which allows me to photograph the coin straight-on. Axial lighting brings out toning better than direct room lighting. If I were to sell a coin and use axial lighting, I would [U]also[/U] provide photos taken in direct lighting. That way, the buyer will likely see both views and their impressions from seeing the listing photos will be confirmed. Coins certainly do not appear the same in all lighting. : ) Here's an example, and both methods of lighting reflect the 'truth,' but they certainly have different appearances. These are unretouched images of my Conder Token. [U]Normal lighting[/U] [IMG]http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/KellysDirectLighting2-up.jpg[/IMG] [U]Axial lighting[/U] [IMG]http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/KellysConderToken2-up1024.jpg[/IMG] Since [U]beautifully toned coins can sell at 2-30 times book value,[/U] I think it's important to show the toning as well as possible in listing photos. In good photos, natural toning will generally be obvious and appear far different from artificially toned coins. Numismatography can help one learn a lot about toning. I believe that someday eye appeal will surpass rarity as the key to value. Digital cameras and the internet are making that begin to happen already. ; )[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Numismatography
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...