NT or AT or QT?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Dynoking, Feb 1, 2020.

  1. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Opinions please.

    1862 10c Seated Liberty Obverse.jpg 1862 10c Seated Liberty Reverse.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    I think the toning looks natural but I would guess that in hand, it looks a lot less dramatic due to some image processing.
     
    Dynoking and Chuck_A like this.
  4. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    NT
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  6. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Correct. Not nearly as vibrant.
     
  7. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    Spectacular piece. I am in the NT camp.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  8. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    I can't stop looking at the details on that coin!

    Screen Shot 2020-02-01 at 9.57.21 AM.png
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  10. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    NT and Market acceptable in my opinion. PCGS Trueview?
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  11. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Yes.
     
  12. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    PCGS so-called "true"views are almost always over saturated, and always far more red than reality. I'll bet in hand this coin is quite attractive and naturally toned.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  13. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    You are correct about the saturation. In hand it is a beautiful, well struck, preserved coin.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2020
  14. Chuck_A

    Chuck_A Well-Known Member

    NT, Nice coin!
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  15. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  16. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    NT and Market Acceptable
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  17. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Ok,
    First thank you everyone for your responses. I don't remember a toning thread were there is 100% agreement on the originality of the surface. NT all the way.
    This coin resided in a cardboard 2X2 since NOV 1973. It was placed into a vinyl flip provided by PCGS sometime in 2015. Last month it got a quick dip in acetone and want to PCGS for grading. What could go wrong?
    It came back Thursday, Genuine UNC Details 91 - Questionable Color, I am livid! A beautiful, original surface, $800+ coin, carefully stored in a cool dark place for the last 47 years comes back QC.
    What can I do with it now?
     
  18. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Call them or break it out and send to another TPG.
     
  19. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    I realize I have the option of using a different TPG, but holy cow. I have an honest coin, and a unanimous panel of experts. A gorgeous coin that has been reduced to ebay fodder. Now I have to spend more money to correct the wrong of a company who passes them selves off to be the best. When does the fun start? This is no longer a pleasureful hobby. I hope I do not have to go through this with each raw coin that I carefully purchased back in the day.
     
  20. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I know and I understand that's why U also said call them and I said that first. CT does have a number of experts or members that are very good with coins but a TPG doesn't care about that.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  21. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Makes me wonder if the acetone soak made the coin appear to clean.
    And thus the grade it got.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page