Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Maxfli, post: 3698283, member: 69089&quot;]I&#039;m hesitant to respond since we&#039;re not going to agree on this and I don&#039;t want to precipitate an argument, but since you asked...</p><p><br /></p><p>No, I don&#039;t think more than one commemorative necessarily would be appropriate.&nbsp; Just because something <u>can</u> be commemorated doesn&#039;t mean it <u>has</u> to be commemorated. It&#039;s not like any harm is done if something gets ignored.</p><p><br /></p><p>Limits and constraints may be arbitrary, but they&#039;re also motivational. They force people to make choices. If more than one subject is worthy of consideration in a given year, then choose the <u>one</u> that&#039;s most worthy, make a beautiful coin to commemorate it, and I&#039;ll almost certainly buy it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Having just one makes the issuing of a commemorative coin a truly special event. It&#039;s not like I&#039;ll lament not having a coin commemorating the second, third or fourth most worthy subject. And I wouldn&#039;t buy them all anyway.</p><p><br /></p><p>Less is more. If the mint would produce fewer non-circulating collector coins, it would make the ones they <u>do</u> produce more meaningful and more desirable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in