Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Not a Henning?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Michael K, post: 3222150, member: 78298"]The article says he used more than 1 die.</p><p><br /></p><p>"You can spot some of the other dates by a hole in the R of Pluribus though not all of the dies had this hole."</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe the 1939 had the R marker, but not all the 1944's did.</p><p><br /></p><p>"In addition to the notorious 1944 no-mintmark nickel, Henning produced five other nickel reverse dies dated 1939, 1946, 1947, and 1953. The sixth date is still a mystery."[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Michael K, post: 3222150, member: 78298"]The article says he used more than 1 die. "You can spot some of the other dates by a hole in the R of Pluribus though not all of the dies had this hole." I believe the 1939 had the R marker, but not all the 1944's did. "In addition to the notorious 1944 no-mintmark nickel, Henning produced five other nickel reverse dies dated 1939, 1946, 1947, and 1953. The sixth date is still a mystery."[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Not a Henning?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...