Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Non-believers.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 5367596, member: 81887"]As someone who also collects fossils, I can say that the issue of forgery and undisclosed restoration is at least as important in fossil collecting as in ancient coins. (Also, the question of laws about digging up and exporting specimens comes up too.) There are some fossils that are sold with no repair or restoration beyond removing excess sediment, some that have had minor repairs, some with major compositing (putting together fragments of two or more damaged specimens to make one nicer-looking piece), and some outright fakes. It's better if such repairs are noted by the seller, though many people who sell fossils commercially are not the same people who excavated them, so they may not always know about repair or restoration on a given specimen. There's a good online site, similar to CoinTalk, called The Fossil Forum that I like to read (and occasionally comment in):</p><p><a href="http://www.thefossilforum.com" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.thefossilforum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefossilforum.com</a></p><p>The "Is It Real?" subforum is a good place to post photos of suspect specimens and get opinions whether a given specimen has undisclosed repair/restoration/etc. Note that, per Fossil Forum rules, offering estimates of monetary value is forbidden. (Imagine if we tried that on CoinTalk!)</p><p>On [USER=19165]@physics-fan3.14[/USER] 's Green River fish specimen, it looks like the larger fish has had some darker sealant added to protect the thin fossil material from flaking off. This is common on fossil fish from that site and is generally acceptable. It also looks like the fine detail in the tail and anal fins might (I'm not sure) have been painted on rather than being original to the fossil. Whether this would be acceptable varies depending on the collector, but I would probably not mind too much, as the fossil does seem to be overall real. It may be worth posting this over there to get more opinions (there are some amazing folks there, including professional paleontologists, who know far more than I do).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 5367596, member: 81887"]As someone who also collects fossils, I can say that the issue of forgery and undisclosed restoration is at least as important in fossil collecting as in ancient coins. (Also, the question of laws about digging up and exporting specimens comes up too.) There are some fossils that are sold with no repair or restoration beyond removing excess sediment, some that have had minor repairs, some with major compositing (putting together fragments of two or more damaged specimens to make one nicer-looking piece), and some outright fakes. It's better if such repairs are noted by the seller, though many people who sell fossils commercially are not the same people who excavated them, so they may not always know about repair or restoration on a given specimen. There's a good online site, similar to CoinTalk, called The Fossil Forum that I like to read (and occasionally comment in): [URL]http://www.thefossilforum.com[/URL] The "Is It Real?" subforum is a good place to post photos of suspect specimens and get opinions whether a given specimen has undisclosed repair/restoration/etc. Note that, per Fossil Forum rules, offering estimates of monetary value is forbidden. (Imagine if we tried that on CoinTalk!) On [USER=19165]@physics-fan3.14[/USER] 's Green River fish specimen, it looks like the larger fish has had some darker sealant added to protect the thin fossil material from flaking off. This is common on fossil fish from that site and is generally acceptable. It also looks like the fine detail in the tail and anal fins might (I'm not sure) have been painted on rather than being original to the fossil. Whether this would be acceptable varies depending on the collector, but I would probably not mind too much, as the fossil does seem to be overall real. It may be worth posting this over there to get more opinions (there are some amazing folks there, including professional paleontologists, who know far more than I do).[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Non-believers.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...