Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Noble Roman Coins "Premium Uncleaned" REVIEW
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="hotwheelsearl, post: 4525678, member: 75143"]**LONG POST WARNING**</p><p>Grab a coffee I guess, and try to enjoy this review more than I enjoyed this whole nightmare of a process. Haha</p><p><br /></p><p>As promised, here is my review of NRC's "Premium Uncleaned" coins.</p><p>You can find them for sale here:</p><p><a href="https://nobleromancoins.com/product_info.php?products_id=1167" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://nobleromancoins.com/product_info.php?products_id=1167" rel="nofollow">https://nobleromancoins.com/product_info.php?products_id=1167</a></p><p><br /></p><p>You may remember from my previous post on NRC's "Deluxe Beginner's Set," where I gave the overall package a pretty low score of 6/10.</p><p>In that review, I gave the uncleaned coins a 5/10 rating.</p><p>However, that was before I finished cleaning everything, and I would like to revise my 5/10 into something somewhat better, with a different grading scale.</p><p><br /></p><p>Since the dichotomy between the successes and failures were so dramatic, I will present each successful coin, in order of worst to best, and give a grade for each.</p><p>At the end I'll tally it up and see what we get.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the roaches, I'll chalk those up to "comes with the territory" and <i>ignore them for the grade</i>. </p><p>However, I want to make it <b>very clear </b>that I am not satisfied with how the coins matched the description. </p><p style="text-align: left"><blockquote><p>"These coins are NOT junk, trust me. In the past, we have referred to these as ‘beginner coins’ or ‘excellent for honing your cleaning skills' or ‘practice coins.’ <b>These are not</b>. As seen in the photo, each of these LRBC issues are<b> simply covered with soft dirt</b> that will respond best with<b> DW soaks and mechanical cleaning</b> with dental picks, common scalpels, and tooth brushing, etc." (emphasis mine)</p> <p style="text-align: left"><br /></p></blockquote></p> <p style="text-align: left">Additionally, the coins are advertised as the SAME as the "True Premium" uncleaned issues, which are described as, basically, being 10/10's with a bit of clay on them. Finally, the description indicated that "nearly half" will clean up to VF or better condition. I found 9/30, or less than one-third to warrant that distinction.</p> <p style="text-align: left">In that respect, I found that the advertising was incorrect. <b>None</b> of the coins I received were at all close to being presentable after just DW and mechanical cleaning. Every single one required a soak in Gringgott's #2, and many also required a harsh lye treatment.</p> <p style="text-align: left"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: left">That being said...</p><p><br /></p><p>I wanted to examine <i>only the successful cleans</i> and ignore the slugs, as we all know that a few bad apples should not spoil the whole bushel.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Cost - $1.70/coin</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><u>Coin #1</u></p><p>AE3, 18mm</p><p>?? ruler</p><p>Gloria Exercitus (single standard) reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120839[/ATTACH] </p><p>This is the worst of the "successful" ones. I can't tell the ruler at all, and you can barely tell the reverse. One might say that I was a bit too harsh in the mechanical cleaning, but there was simply no other way to get the detail that I did.</p><p><b>Rating</b>: 2/10</p><p><br /></p><p><u>Coin #2</u></p><p>AE4, 16mm</p><p>Valens</p><p>Gloria Romanorum reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120840[/ATTACH] </p><p>At least this one is fully identifiable. The portrait seems to have been the victim of a deliberate damaging campaign, but I don't remember Valens being subjected to a Damnatio Memoriae. Or maybe it's just coincidental damage.</p><p>Reverse is reasonable, and the patina is nice and even, with excellent color.</p><p><b>Rating</b>: <b>6/10</b></p><p><br /></p><p><u>Coin #3</u></p><p>AE3, 17mm</p><p>Constantius II</p><p>FTR Horseman reverse</p><p><u>[ATTACH=full]1120841[/ATTACH] </u></p><p>The letters on the obverse are nice and clear, but most of the details are rather mushy. The horseman on the reverse is actually rather nice in hand, but again details are sort of hit-and-miss on this one. The ragged flan takes away from the overall experience.</p><p><b>Rating</b>: <b>4/10</b></p><p><br /></p><p><u>Coin #4</u></p><p>AE3, 17mm</p><p>VRBS ROMA</p><p>Romulus and Remus reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120842[/ATTACH] This one had tons of potential, but unfortunately it falls short of the mark. The face of the bust is nice, but the pitting on the cheek and rest of head really kill this one. Likewise, the most interesting part of the reverse is obliterated by pitting. </p><p><b>Rating: 5/10</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><u>Coin #5</u></p><p>AE3, 18mm (oblong)</p><p>Constantius II</p><p>FTR Horseman</p><p><u>[ATTACH=full]1120843[/ATTACH]</u></p><p>Overall, quite nice. The portrait is striking, although some letters are cut off. The reverse is as good as you'd expect from a generic FTR. Main horseman is highly stylized, and the flow lines actually give it a pretty nice appearance. Unfortunately, the fallen enemy is sort of busted which is tough. The coin has a decent green-brown patina in hand which is pretty good.</p><p><b>Rating: 7/10</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><u>Coin #6</u></p><p>AE3, 17mm</p><p>Constans</p><p>FTR Galley reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120844[/ATTACH] </p><p>Again, lots of potential but falls short. Obverse is decent, but the face is uneven and doesn't look too attractive. The reverse is GREAT though. Sharp details in the human figures, and the one on the right has spaghetti-arms which I really like. Uneven color across the entire coin is sort of distracting.</p><p><b>Rating: 7/10</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><u>Coin #7</u></p><p>AE3, 16mm</p><p>Constantine II </p><p>Gloria Exercitus (single standard)</p><p><u>[ATTACH=full]1120845[/ATTACH]</u></p><p>Once again, so much potential but just not enough. It's obvious that the obverse is pretty ruined by the large black blotch, which is quite a shame because details are quite sharp underneath. The reverse is stunning. Extremely sharp details all around. You can see every detail of the soldier uniforms, and even the facial expressions on the men. Too bad about the black face, otherwise this would have been a great coin with lovely light green patina.</p><p><b>Rating: 6/10</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><u>Coin #8</u></p><p>AE3, 17mm (oblong)</p><p>Constantinopolis commemorative</p><p>Victory on prow reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120846[/ATTACH] </p><p>This is wonderful all around. The obverse is a bit mushy, but overall good. Eyes and cuirass look great. The reverse is very very nice. The angel is extremely sharp, and you can see great details of the galley and shield very well. Excellent, even patina.</p><p><b>Rating: 8/10</b></p><p><br /></p><p><u>Coin #9</u></p><p>AE antoninianus, 17mm</p><p>Claudius II</p><p>Salus reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120847[/ATTACH] </p><p>This one is stunning. You can see a bit of overzealous mechanical cleaning gave Clavdiv a bit of a Rudolph-nose, but that was 100% my fault. Although it's unfortunate that none of the letters are visible on the undersized flan, I *think* it's Claudius II. The reverse really makes this for me. The female deity is <i><b>superb</b> </i>and can't really get much better. 80% of intact silvering makes this one of the nicest Claudius II coins I've seen.</p><p><b>Rating: 10/10</b></p><p><br /></p><p><u>Coin #10</u></p><p>AE3, 18mm</p><p>VRBS ROMA</p><p>Romulus and Remus reverse</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1120848[/ATTACH] </p><p>This is a wowzer for sure. The details are just superb front and back. I absolutely love the extreme detail in the reverse, you can even see the little hands of the twins on the wolf's teats. Unfortunately, the unevenly colored patina brings this down somewhat, which is a true shame since this would have been a perfect coin in every respect otherwise.</p><p><b>Rating: 9/10</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Average of all ratings: 6.4/10</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Value for the cost</b>: Decent. Considering that one would have spent $51 on 9 identifiable coins, you're talking $5.60 a coin. The FTRs are pretty cheap but the glorius Claudius Salus and the lovely VRBS ROMA and Constantinople would make up for it. Overall, you get pretty much exactly your money's worth.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Fun Factor</b>: horrible. I had no fun doing this at all. The fine motor control needed, and eye strain, and the neck stress was absolutely not worth the results. After spending nearly 15 hours on 20 coins, I would have had more fun picking up used cigarette butts with my bare hands.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Satisfaction</b>: reasonable. There's nothing quite like taking a dirty, caked and unrecognizable piece of *something* and uncovering an XF+ quality, silvered Ant of Claudius II. However, the dissatisfaction from spending over 30 minutes just to reveal a slug, when expecting for something recognizable, pretty much evened out the joy from getting something reasonable. </p><p><br /></p><p><b>Recommendation</b>: if you come into this knowing full well that you'll spend $51 on 10 cleanable coins with 20 being roaches, then you should buy. If you come into this knowing that you will spend a LOT of time and chemicals on the cleaning process, then you should buy.</p><p>If you read the description and expect to pop coins in a bowl, come back a few days later, and toothbrush them to perfection, then you will be severely disappointed.</p><p>Basically, if you know exactly what you're getting then this is a great purchase.</p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Conclusion</b>: The quality of the cleanable coins was, in general, decent. I was able to raise good detail, sometimes <i>excellent</i> detail, but only with extreme effort. I'm sorry, there's just NO way that anybody can use DW and tools and get over half of the coins to look anywhere near presentable. I spent between 30 minutes and 2 hours per coin, which is a far cry from a quick rinse and scrub. I did not showcase the slugs (20 of them) because they're just ugly slugs.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Final Word</b>: Advertising these coins as a quick "rinse-and-flip" is false advertising. They all took extreme effort and chemicals, and were a nightmare to clean. Although the quality of the cleanable coins was overall good, the high expectations I had were completely unfulfilled, and I highly doubt I will buy these again. <i>Maybe</i> the "true premiums" just for the sake of another review, but I had absolutely no fun from this process.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="hotwheelsearl, post: 4525678, member: 75143"]**LONG POST WARNING** Grab a coffee I guess, and try to enjoy this review more than I enjoyed this whole nightmare of a process. Haha As promised, here is my review of NRC's "Premium Uncleaned" coins. You can find them for sale here: [URL]https://nobleromancoins.com/product_info.php?products_id=1167[/URL] You may remember from my previous post on NRC's "Deluxe Beginner's Set," where I gave the overall package a pretty low score of 6/10. In that review, I gave the uncleaned coins a 5/10 rating. However, that was before I finished cleaning everything, and I would like to revise my 5/10 into something somewhat better, with a different grading scale. Since the dichotomy between the successes and failures were so dramatic, I will present each successful coin, in order of worst to best, and give a grade for each. At the end I'll tally it up and see what we get. As for the roaches, I'll chalk those up to "comes with the territory" and [I]ignore them for the grade[/I]. However, I want to make it [B]very clear [/B]that I am not satisfied with how the coins matched the description. [LEFT][INDENT]"These coins are NOT junk, trust me. In the past, we have referred to these as ‘beginner coins’ or ‘excellent for honing your cleaning skills' or ‘practice coins.’ [B]These are not[/B]. As seen in the photo, each of these LRBC issues are[B] simply covered with soft dirt[/B] that will respond best with[B] DW soaks and mechanical cleaning[/B] with dental picks, common scalpels, and tooth brushing, etc." (emphasis mine) [/INDENT] Additionally, the coins are advertised as the SAME as the "True Premium" uncleaned issues, which are described as, basically, being 10/10's with a bit of clay on them. Finally, the description indicated that "nearly half" will clean up to VF or better condition. I found 9/30, or less than one-third to warrant that distinction. In that respect, I found that the advertising was incorrect. [B]None[/B] of the coins I received were at all close to being presentable after just DW and mechanical cleaning. Every single one required a soak in Gringgott's #2, and many also required a harsh lye treatment. That being said...[/LEFT] I wanted to examine [I]only the successful cleans[/I] and ignore the slugs, as we all know that a few bad apples should not spoil the whole bushel. [B]Cost - $1.70/coin [/B] [U]Coin #1[/U] AE3, 18mm ?? ruler Gloria Exercitus (single standard) reverse [ATTACH=full]1120839[/ATTACH] This is the worst of the "successful" ones. I can't tell the ruler at all, and you can barely tell the reverse. One might say that I was a bit too harsh in the mechanical cleaning, but there was simply no other way to get the detail that I did. [B]Rating[/B]: 2/10 [U]Coin #2[/U] AE4, 16mm Valens Gloria Romanorum reverse [ATTACH=full]1120840[/ATTACH] At least this one is fully identifiable. The portrait seems to have been the victim of a deliberate damaging campaign, but I don't remember Valens being subjected to a Damnatio Memoriae. Or maybe it's just coincidental damage. Reverse is reasonable, and the patina is nice and even, with excellent color. [B]Rating[/B]: [B]6/10[/B] [U]Coin #3[/U] AE3, 17mm Constantius II FTR Horseman reverse [U][ATTACH=full]1120841[/ATTACH] [/U] The letters on the obverse are nice and clear, but most of the details are rather mushy. The horseman on the reverse is actually rather nice in hand, but again details are sort of hit-and-miss on this one. The ragged flan takes away from the overall experience. [B]Rating[/B]: [B]4/10[/B] [U]Coin #4[/U] AE3, 17mm VRBS ROMA Romulus and Remus reverse [ATTACH=full]1120842[/ATTACH] This one had tons of potential, but unfortunately it falls short of the mark. The face of the bust is nice, but the pitting on the cheek and rest of head really kill this one. Likewise, the most interesting part of the reverse is obliterated by pitting. [B]Rating: 5/10 [/B] [U]Coin #5[/U] AE3, 18mm (oblong) Constantius II FTR Horseman [U][ATTACH=full]1120843[/ATTACH][/U] Overall, quite nice. The portrait is striking, although some letters are cut off. The reverse is as good as you'd expect from a generic FTR. Main horseman is highly stylized, and the flow lines actually give it a pretty nice appearance. Unfortunately, the fallen enemy is sort of busted which is tough. The coin has a decent green-brown patina in hand which is pretty good. [B]Rating: 7/10 [/B] [U]Coin #6[/U] AE3, 17mm Constans FTR Galley reverse [ATTACH=full]1120844[/ATTACH] Again, lots of potential but falls short. Obverse is decent, but the face is uneven and doesn't look too attractive. The reverse is GREAT though. Sharp details in the human figures, and the one on the right has spaghetti-arms which I really like. Uneven color across the entire coin is sort of distracting. [B]Rating: 7/10 [/B] [U]Coin #7[/U] AE3, 16mm Constantine II Gloria Exercitus (single standard) [U][ATTACH=full]1120845[/ATTACH][/U] Once again, so much potential but just not enough. It's obvious that the obverse is pretty ruined by the large black blotch, which is quite a shame because details are quite sharp underneath. The reverse is stunning. Extremely sharp details all around. You can see every detail of the soldier uniforms, and even the facial expressions on the men. Too bad about the black face, otherwise this would have been a great coin with lovely light green patina. [B]Rating: 6/10 [/B] [U]Coin #8[/U] AE3, 17mm (oblong) Constantinopolis commemorative Victory on prow reverse [ATTACH=full]1120846[/ATTACH] This is wonderful all around. The obverse is a bit mushy, but overall good. Eyes and cuirass look great. The reverse is very very nice. The angel is extremely sharp, and you can see great details of the galley and shield very well. Excellent, even patina. [B]Rating: 8/10[/B] [U]Coin #9[/U] AE antoninianus, 17mm Claudius II Salus reverse [ATTACH=full]1120847[/ATTACH] This one is stunning. You can see a bit of overzealous mechanical cleaning gave Clavdiv a bit of a Rudolph-nose, but that was 100% my fault. Although it's unfortunate that none of the letters are visible on the undersized flan, I *think* it's Claudius II. The reverse really makes this for me. The female deity is [I][B]superb[/B] [/I]and can't really get much better. 80% of intact silvering makes this one of the nicest Claudius II coins I've seen. [B]Rating: 10/10[/B] [U]Coin #10[/U] AE3, 18mm VRBS ROMA Romulus and Remus reverse [ATTACH=full]1120848[/ATTACH] This is a wowzer for sure. The details are just superb front and back. I absolutely love the extreme detail in the reverse, you can even see the little hands of the twins on the wolf's teats. Unfortunately, the unevenly colored patina brings this down somewhat, which is a true shame since this would have been a perfect coin in every respect otherwise. [B]Rating: 9/10 Average of all ratings: 6.4/10 Value for the cost[/B]: Decent. Considering that one would have spent $51 on 9 identifiable coins, you're talking $5.60 a coin. The FTRs are pretty cheap but the glorius Claudius Salus and the lovely VRBS ROMA and Constantinople would make up for it. Overall, you get pretty much exactly your money's worth. [B]Fun Factor[/B]: horrible. I had no fun doing this at all. The fine motor control needed, and eye strain, and the neck stress was absolutely not worth the results. After spending nearly 15 hours on 20 coins, I would have had more fun picking up used cigarette butts with my bare hands. [B]Satisfaction[/B]: reasonable. There's nothing quite like taking a dirty, caked and unrecognizable piece of *something* and uncovering an XF+ quality, silvered Ant of Claudius II. However, the dissatisfaction from spending over 30 minutes just to reveal a slug, when expecting for something recognizable, pretty much evened out the joy from getting something reasonable. [B]Recommendation[/B]: if you come into this knowing full well that you'll spend $51 on 10 cleanable coins with 20 being roaches, then you should buy. If you come into this knowing that you will spend a LOT of time and chemicals on the cleaning process, then you should buy. If you read the description and expect to pop coins in a bowl, come back a few days later, and toothbrush them to perfection, then you will be severely disappointed. Basically, if you know exactly what you're getting then this is a great purchase. [B] Conclusion[/B]: The quality of the cleanable coins was, in general, decent. I was able to raise good detail, sometimes [I]excellent[/I] detail, but only with extreme effort. I'm sorry, there's just NO way that anybody can use DW and tools and get over half of the coins to look anywhere near presentable. I spent between 30 minutes and 2 hours per coin, which is a far cry from a quick rinse and scrub. I did not showcase the slugs (20 of them) because they're just ugly slugs. [B]Final Word[/B]: Advertising these coins as a quick "rinse-and-flip" is false advertising. They all took extreme effort and chemicals, and were a nightmare to clean. Although the quality of the cleanable coins was overall good, the high expectations I had were completely unfulfilled, and I highly doubt I will buy these again. [I]Maybe[/I] the "true premiums" just for the sake of another review, but I had absolutely no fun from this process.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Noble Roman Coins "Premium Uncleaned" REVIEW
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...