Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
nicholasz219's top, uh, 15
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3928887, member: 19463"]I can accept this coin as normal for a mint not known for being too normal. Fourree is a very specific term for a plated coin with a base metal core and precious skin. It does not mean just any variation of strange. What you see as an extra letter after the M is the balance scales held by Moneta. This one shows it more clearly but is a bit less common with IVLA on the obverse and two dots on the reverse. There are hundreds of flyspeck level variations from 'Emesa' which Martin and I occasionally give in to boring those of you who don't obsess on Severans. He prefers what was once termed "Laodicea" while I find it the least appealing of the Eastern mints but now fear that the mint ID picture is much more complicated than we thought. Those scholars who think they can pontificate and call everything 'Antioch' just don't understand the question. I prefer to explain away things by fantasizing a mobile mint travelling with the emperor rather than a fixed unit in some city but my fantasies are nothing more than that. Those who need neatly packaged answers should collect something else.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1035559[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3928887, member: 19463"]I can accept this coin as normal for a mint not known for being too normal. Fourree is a very specific term for a plated coin with a base metal core and precious skin. It does not mean just any variation of strange. What you see as an extra letter after the M is the balance scales held by Moneta. This one shows it more clearly but is a bit less common with IVLA on the obverse and two dots on the reverse. There are hundreds of flyspeck level variations from 'Emesa' which Martin and I occasionally give in to boring those of you who don't obsess on Severans. He prefers what was once termed "Laodicea" while I find it the least appealing of the Eastern mints but now fear that the mint ID picture is much more complicated than we thought. Those scholars who think they can pontificate and call everything 'Antioch' just don't understand the question. I prefer to explain away things by fantasizing a mobile mint travelling with the emperor rather than a fixed unit in some city but my fantasies are nothing more than that. Those who need neatly packaged answers should collect something else. [ATTACH=full]1035559[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
nicholasz219's top, uh, 15
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...