In a technical sense yes, in a grading sense no. A coin can be purely uncirculated but heavily toned. And if someone takes that coin and over-dips it - all of the luster will be destroyed - gonzo. Once that happens, no TPG will slab that coin as Unc.
I had to find a good example of this. Look at these pics, even though the coin is heavily toned, see how you can still see the luster under and through the toning ? That's a sign of the real deal.
Nice Now thats pretty natural toning !:kewl::mouth: And the coin ain't too shabby either , beautiful coin & a great example of NT . rzage:hatch::hammer:
Excellent point...I never realized this before, but it makes sense. One reason why I love this forum.
Well to be even more accurate, the coins known as "Silver" are actually made up of an outer layer of 80% silver, 20% copper bonded to an inner core of 21% silver, 79% copper. So in a sense they are silver-clad coins. The "clad" coins are made of an outer core of 75% copper and 25% nickel bonded to a pure copper innner core. So really, they're both clad coins if you think about it.
I picked up that tip from the guy at the Anaconda table at a coin show (they have a lot of great toned coins). He said that it is the first thing he looks for.
me too. It looks nice GD, Ive heard this from you before, being here doesn't make you want to start again?
The 1905 indian AT is tough to tell, I agree that this one is a tough call, it doesn't look like the typical 'crayon colors' typical with AT coins.