Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 8732632, member: 76863&quot;]It sounds like you have more of a problem with people that post about CAC than them.&nbsp; They aren’t fostering elitism.&nbsp; I have a guess who the issue is with but if you hated every company where you didn’t like every investor/person/people that talk about it there’s not a company on earth you could use aside from someone with a smoker on the side of the road.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Some certainly do overhype it, and some certainly trash it to even a greater extent the other way, but there’s no denying the grading expertise or the value of two companies over one.</p><p><br /></p><p>Its really collectors that ultimately decide these things.&nbsp; Dealers hate having to have coins graded and/or go to CAC, it’s much easier and cheaper to sell it raw and hype it up.&nbsp; Don’t forget too that the sticker was never meant for all the coins that ended up getting submitted, they’ve been aggressively raising prices for quite sometime to try and stop getting low/lower value coins.&nbsp; Collectors wanting that are diving that part.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>CAC certainly gets negative feedback, but it’s just not true to call them marketing BS.&nbsp; It’s also a very different situation than trying to redo the grading scale.&nbsp; CAC didn’t drastically switch the grading scale.&nbsp; Switching from 70 to 10 which is really 100 would be like football calling touchdowns 10 points, having both is even worse where it’s like on Thursdays it’s 10 points but goes back to 6 on Sunday[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in