Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 8731783, member: 19165&quot;]Now this... this I like. As you know, I&#039;ve been trying to do this for a few years. </p><p><br /></p><p>Strike, Luster, Eye Appeal, and Contact Marks (or wear, depending). Obverse and Reverse separated into individual scores. Give each side a score out of 5. </p><p><br /></p><p>And give a few short descriptors of any unusual marks, problems, etc. (doesn&#039;t have to be more than 4/5 single words or short phrases). </p><p><br /></p><p>This would truly be the most useful grading scale! </p><p><br /></p><p>The problem is... the market would have absolutely no idea what to do with this, or how to value these. That&#039;s part of the problem that NGC Ancients has experienced. I absolutely love that they&#039;ve broken the grade into strike and surface components. I wish they&#039;d take it a step farther! But it seems that more of the ancients these days are just being given a generic, useless, and completely boring VF or EF or whatever.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in