Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 8729279, member: 76863&quot;]The 100 point has been overwhelmingly rejected with push back and threats to leave collecting by the majority anytime it gained steam.&nbsp; Other proposals to change the system have been rejected as well even ones by big names.&nbsp; Anyone saying this might be cool is in the minority as you can see from reactions on numerous platforms </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Unless the graders are still just grading on the 70 scale with someone else doing the conversion it will change the grading having to think of different numbers.&nbsp; If that is what they&#039;re doing that just shows what a dumb gimmick this is.&nbsp; The ironic part about this is that if NGC really pushes this (I think it will go away just like the W for white labels) all they really did was help PCGS.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>CAC will very likely pass NGC for US coins, that leaves the race for market share with world coins.&nbsp; Even as a limited rollout PCGS can now go to the international market that is still in the early stages of embracing grading which they eventually will embrace and say we have one grading scale unlike our competitor.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Never going to happen.&nbsp; The billions and billions and billions of value in the market would crash causing the majority to just leave collecting if the system was turned on its head.&nbsp; Theres no reason for a new system, one or two simple tweaks such as getting rid of the hard 58 line fixes the majority of problems.&nbsp; No system is ever going to be perfect anyways.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in