Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jaelus, post: 2424565, member: 46237&quot;]While it doesn&#039;t look like much of a difference, the 1914 and 1915 koronas that graded a point under what I had expected were pretty disappointing to me. They are both common dates that I&#039;ve been aggressively trying to upgrade, and the single point on those would have made a big difference for my set.</p><p><br /></p><p>Still, I can&#039;t really complain. For the most part, the grades were one point in either direction from what I expected, except for that 1912 korona and the 2 pengo that got details. I&#039;m very pleased with the grades on this submission on the whole, especially on those 1892 key date koronas. The finest example of that date that I&#039;ve seen before at auction was a nicely-toned 63, and it sold for a hefty sum. I paid less than that for the pair I picked up and they graded 65 and 65+.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in