Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Numismania, post: 1909276, member: 28971&quot;]A while back, boy, did things change.&nbsp; It was almost as if ANACS became ICG and vice versa.&nbsp; ANACS did take a &#039;hit&#039;, and, IMHO, their grading on some series, changed for the worst, but some, like Morgan&#039;s, remained pretty much solid.&nbsp; For your best chance at picking up a nice Morgan on the &#039;cheap&#039;, in hopes to at least crossover to one of the top 2 TPG&#039;s, giving it a better resale value, ANACS isn&#039;t a bad choice at all.&nbsp; Not crazy about how they grade Washies, in particular (they grade Washies very similar to how ICG did).&nbsp; I sent 3 &#039;new&#039; ANACS (blue and yellow label) for &#039;crossover&#039; to PCGS, 1 downgraded 1 grade (66 to 65), the other 2 dropped 2 full grades (67 to 65)...I would have been happy had those 2 only downgraded 1 pt.&nbsp; Before the change, I sent in five ICG Washies, and only 1 &#039;crossed&#039; at 1 grade lower, 3 downgraded by 2 pts, 1 came back &#039;Unc details....cleaned&#039;, which I thought the toning just might be hiding.&nbsp; Modern stuff seems to always be overgraded, much like ICG was doing, but, as I said, it seemed as if just the &#039;names changed&#039;. </p><p><br /></p><p>Ethan, if your coins are Morgan&#039;s, my opinion is, you have a 50/50 shot a crossing with ANACS Morgan&#039;s.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in