Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1439280, member: 15309&quot;]If Doug is not offended by my continued obstinence, I don&#039;t think it is possible to offend him.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Oh I just knew that coin was going to make it into this thread.&nbsp; Not trying to defend the grading of that coin but a guy on the PCGS forum did a pretty good job of showing how the angle of the photo can make the appearance of full bands disappear.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&amp;threadid=855610&amp;STARTPAGE=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&amp;threadid=855610&amp;STARTPAGE=1" rel="nofollow">Buy the Holder, Not the Coin....WOW!</a></p><p><br /></p><p>FWIW, I think that coin is a mechanical error.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I guess I should be mad at Paul (Winged Liberty) for making me agree with you Doug.&nbsp; LOL</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, PCGS is more conservative with respect to their grading of premium gem Jefferson Nickels than NGC, but NGC is far more strict with their application of the full step designation.&nbsp; I promise that the kool-aid drinkers would lose a lot of money if they crossed their full step Jeffs into NGC holders.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>EAC guys are exempt from the labels in my book.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in