Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
NGC MSDPL
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Jaelus, post: 3216843, member: 46237"]I don't agree. A coin is either proof-like or not at the time it is struck. Contact marks, etc. will lower the grade, but it won't fundamentally transform the coin into something else. I have an NGC MS61 PL in my collection. By your statements above, do you think it's impossible for an MS61 to be PL?</p><p><br /></p><p>I have many friends and acquaintances that are dealers or are otherwise advanced numismatists, and due to my interest in PL coins I've had many of them inspect my PL coins and have inspected many of theirs. While there is some subjectivity on the lower end (semi-PL coins), generally speaking people agree on a coin being PL or DPL based on visual inspection. Not one of them has ever pulled out a ruler to measure the reflection distance before weighing in on whether a coin was PL or not. The reflectivity test is not only completely unnecessary, but also erroneous.</p><p><br /></p><p>Last year I bought a 20 krajczar in an NGC PF62 slab. They slabbed it as a proof because they thought it was the 1960s restrike, but I noticed it was a prooflike that didn't have the restrike mark. I sent it in for them to correct the mistake, but although they changed it from being a restrike proof to the business strike, they changed the grade from PF62 to MS62. They refused to even give it PL. How does it make sense that the coin was proof-like enough that they literally mistook it for a proof, but not proof-like enough to get the PL designation? This is completely counterintuitive, but it was because the impairment of the surfaces made it fail the reflectivity test, despite being so obviously proof-like that it got slabbed as a proof. When the bar for getting a proof-like designation is higher than the bar for being deemed an actual proof, something is very wrong. If that doesn't perfectly illustrate what's wrong with using the reflectivity test, nothing will.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Jaelus, post: 3216843, member: 46237"]I don't agree. A coin is either proof-like or not at the time it is struck. Contact marks, etc. will lower the grade, but it won't fundamentally transform the coin into something else. I have an NGC MS61 PL in my collection. By your statements above, do you think it's impossible for an MS61 to be PL? I have many friends and acquaintances that are dealers or are otherwise advanced numismatists, and due to my interest in PL coins I've had many of them inspect my PL coins and have inspected many of theirs. While there is some subjectivity on the lower end (semi-PL coins), generally speaking people agree on a coin being PL or DPL based on visual inspection. Not one of them has ever pulled out a ruler to measure the reflection distance before weighing in on whether a coin was PL or not. The reflectivity test is not only completely unnecessary, but also erroneous. Last year I bought a 20 krajczar in an NGC PF62 slab. They slabbed it as a proof because they thought it was the 1960s restrike, but I noticed it was a prooflike that didn't have the restrike mark. I sent it in for them to correct the mistake, but although they changed it from being a restrike proof to the business strike, they changed the grade from PF62 to MS62. They refused to even give it PL. How does it make sense that the coin was proof-like enough that they literally mistook it for a proof, but not proof-like enough to get the PL designation? This is completely counterintuitive, but it was because the impairment of the surfaces made it fail the reflectivity test, despite being so obviously proof-like that it got slabbed as a proof. When the bar for getting a proof-like designation is higher than the bar for being deemed an actual proof, something is very wrong. If that doesn't perfectly illustrate what's wrong with using the reflectivity test, nothing will.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
NGC MSDPL
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...