Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;treylxapi47, post: 1913560, member: 41863&quot;]I&#039;m saying that the market could be misrepresented though. </p><p><br /></p><p>That of course the dealers want these slider coins, to sell. If they submitted an AU-58, don&#039;t you think they would rather see it as an MS-63? </p><p><br /></p><p>Who does that benefit? The graders and the dealers, not the collector. The collector winds up with an AU coin for MS money, but the dealer made the extra $$$, and then he just sent in all his other sliders to hope for similar results, thus leading to TPGs with more money. Who submits more coins, btw? Collectors? or Dealers?</p><p><br /></p><p>Far too few collectors would be able to distinguish if that coin was really an AU, case and point there is Doug, HE knows grading like no other, where as I&#039;ve seen many argue against him and typically they were wrong. His point is usually always solid though, if it circulated there&#039;s no way it could ever be labeled MS.</p><p><br /></p><p>This falls on the collector though to reject those inferior coins priced wrong. </p><p><br /></p><p>I merely wanted to point out that we as collectors should question any time we hear something being talked about as &#039;market acceptable&#039;, that is not a term that is beneficial to us, and is an area people should study up on not to get burned.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in