Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;treylxapi47, post: 1913550, member: 41863&quot;]I see what you are saying though, Doug, and how this hinges on education at the collector level. </p><p><br /></p><p>If we all rejected those &#039;market acceptable&#039; coins then maybe they would disappear or the TPGs would respond by altering their standards to exclude such coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>Alas, the collector base just seems to like getting screwed for the most part. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also, let&#039;s not forget that the TPGs do grade many, MANY coins to an agreeable level. I&#039;m mainly just focused on the few that fall into a market acceptable range, these would be mostly &#039;slider&#039; type coins. MS-63s that should be AU-58s, XF-45s that should be AU or XF Details, etc. </p><p><br /></p><p>I know I make a big deal about things and have the tendency to focus in on one tiny flaw, so just so everyone understands this isn&#039;t an all out assault rebellion on TPGs, I&#039;m&nbsp; just arguing in terms of Market Grading and trying to understand this &#039;market&#039; a little better. </p><p><br /></p><p>Sorry for being confrontational in my methods.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in