Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Beefer518, post: 3089724, member: 87737&quot;][USER=19250]@Paddy54[/USER] - the squeaky wheel can also get a cease and desist order, or worse, a defamation lawsuit.</p><p><br /></p><p>IMO, and it&#039;s worth exactly what you&#039;re paying for it, and based solely on the evidence provided (by only one side of the story), I believe the medal was in the same condition when received as it was when the OP sent it. I base that on the photos provided by the OP.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you look at the 2 pics that [USER=36230]@BooksB4Coins[/USER] posted above, you can see anomalies in the same areas on the face of Liberty in the first image as you see clearly in the second. Along with the angled shots to highlight imperfections that aren&#039;t apparent in the head-on shots makes me think they were there before being sent. How many times have you seen something on a coin that you only see at one angle and not at another?</p><p><br /></p><p>And to make a suspicious person&#039;s suspicions worse, the OP had many of these medals for submission (7 IIRC). How can he prove with any degree of certainty that the images he is providing of the pre-submission are of the same medal he claims was damaged? Does he have more medals that weren&#039;t submitted, but were photographed for inventory purposes and they have been mixed up?</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not trying to bash the OP, or suggest any lying or deceit, but there is enough doubt in my mind that he wouldn&#039;t get my vote in a civil case. Think of me as one of the 12 peers that would evaluate the evidence provided, and that my thoughts are just one way everything could be perceived.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in