Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;iPen, post: 3025565, member: 69760&quot;]OK, NGC told me that it&#039;s impossible that it&#039;s from a different submitter because each individual item is marked with the customer number. I sent an email containing the original photos and a comparison with the online cert photos to the rep directly, which she confirmed receipt of; she says it&#039;s going to management and NGC may &quot;buy the coin&quot; from me if it&#039;s found that NGC damaged the coin. She also told me that there&#039;s no policy on this sort of thing per se, and that it&#039;s all on a case-by-case basis.</p><p><br /></p><p>So it must be that someone at NGC damaged it. This is an over-sized medal so it&#039;s not unlikely that it was accidentally mishandled. But, that person didn&#039;t self-report the damage. There must be cameras...</p><p><br /></p><p>And, even if that huge gouge is on the brand new over-sized slab (which is what they&#039;re supposed to check for during the Quality Control phase), there are a bunch of hairline scratches that weren&#039;t on the medal before. It graded as a PF-66DCAM - I only submitted this medal because it&#039;s clear to any collector that it&#039;s a 69 (or a 68 if the graders are having a bad day).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in