Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Sallent, post: 3204270, member: 76194&quot;][USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER]&nbsp; It is a fact that all my coins are part of the Sallent Collection, as that is the identity the collector who owns those particular coins chooses to publicly go by <b>(key word &#039;collector&#039; as I am not a dealer)</b>. Why is it any less of an important attribution than the typical stuff you see in Agora and other auction houses with the description &quot;From the collection of a Texas Doctor&quot;, or The (insert random name) Collection. Just because the person or the collection itself is not famous doesn&#039;t mean the attribution is not accurate nor has any value.</p><p><br /></p><p>Frankly, I may have a few Agora coins attributed to &quot;The Collection of a California Dentist&quot; or &quot;The (random name) collection,&quot; etc. Since Agora attributes a particular source to those coins, why can&#039;t I have NGC then add that attribution to a holder? I could care less if someone down the line decides coins from my collection with the label &quot;Sallent Collection&quot; or &quot;Collection of a California Dentist&quot; don&#039;t have any extra value....that&#039;s up to the future bidders to use their brains and decide for themselves whenever my collection goes for sale (when I get too old and decide to downsize, or die). The facts remain that those attributions are factual and not misleading. My coins, which I personally own, are the Sallent Collection. That is an easily verifiable statement. Whether the collection is famous, mediocre, noteworthy, or forgettable, that&#039;s up to future would-be-owners to decide for themselves.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in