Newp: Ptolemaic dinner plate

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by red_spork, Aug 3, 2015.

  1. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    I have a soft spot for Ptolemaics, probably because a Ptolemaic AE was my first Greek coin and my only one for quite a while, so this massive ancient that came in today is a pickup that I'm already extremely fond of and couldn't wait to share. I purchased this from a good friend who allowed me to pick the one I liked most from 3 that he recently purchased. I'm actually using his pictures and some cell phone pictures of mine below because I was having trouble with my camera. This is by far my biggest ancient and a type that I've wanted to pick up for quite some time. This massive thing is 65 grams, 39mm in diameter and 8mm thick!

    [​IMG]

    Ptolemaic Kingdom. Ptolemy IV Philopator. 222-205/4 BC. Æ Drachm (39mm, 65g, 8mm thick). Alexandria mint. Series 5. Diademed head of Zeus-Ammon right /ΠΤΟΛΣΜΑΙΟΥ ΒΑΣΙΛΣΩΣ Eagle with closed wings standing left on thunderbolt; to left, filleted cornucopia; Σ control mark between legs. Svoronos 992; Weiser 61 (Ptolemy III); SNG Copenhagen 205-6; Noeske 147-9. Note: Svoronos attributes to Ptolemy III

    Now of course, my post wouldn't be complete without a family picture with my two smallest Ptolemies for comparison:

    IMG_20150803_205057.jpg

    And some individual shots with the sizes:

    [​IMG]
    Ptolemy III, Euergetes, 246-222 BC AE Trihemichalkon(15mm, 2.9g). Diademed head of Zeus-Ammon right/ΠΤΟΛΣΜΑΙΟΥ ΒΑΣΙΛΣΩΣ Eagle standing left on thunderbolt, trident left. Ex. J. P. Righetti Collection #42. Svoronos 839


    [​IMG]

    Ptolemy III, Euergetes, 246-222 BC AE Chalkous(12.0mm, 2.0g). Diademed head of Zeus-Ammon right/ΠΤΟΛΣΜΑΙΟΥ ΒΑΣΙΛΣΩΣ Eagle standing left on thunderbolt, trident left. Ex. J. P. Righetti Collection #43. Svoronos 840

    Anyone else got any huge Ptolemies or tiny Ptolemies? Lets seem em! I wonder if anyone has one smaller than my Svoronos 840 :)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I love the 8mm thick one!
     
  4. Valentinian

    Valentinian Well-Known Member

    That coin is truly remarkable. 8 mm thick! You can show that to a non-collector and they will certainly be impressed. I'm impressed!
     
  5. Jwt708

    Jwt708 Well-Known Member

    Wow, that one fat Ptolemy! I'm quite jealous.

    It's a great night for the Ptolemy's! I just posted my three...but I'm going to do it again anyway.:D

    My newest, not in hand yet, but it's a Ptolemy IV, Svoronos 1128:
    [​IMG]
    Below is my second Ptolemaic purchase:
    Ptolemy III BC 246-222
    AE 38.6mm, 41.6g, Alexandria mint
    Bust of Zeus-Amon right
    Eagle standing half left on fulmen, wings closed, head right, filleted cornucopia right ascending from behind shoulder, E between legs
    Svoronous 974
    (my computer won't do Greek, otherwise I would include the legend)
    [​IMG]

    And my first purchase which is to date my largest:
    Ptolemy IV, BC 221-204
    AE 41mm, 64g, Alexandria mint
    Bust of Zeus-Ammon right
    Eagle standing left on thunderbolt; cornucopia tied with fillet before, DELTA IOTA between legs
    Svoronos 1125

    [​IMG]

    I want to add some little ones.
     
  6. zumbly

    zumbly Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana

    That's an incredible chunk of change, red. Well-chosen!
     
  7. Jwt708

    Jwt708 Well-Known Member

    Red - I really love your little Ptolemies (spelling?) too!
     
  8. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Don't own any but wow that thing is huge, never seen the thickness in pics before.
     
  9. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    On most of what I have, the thickness of the coin can be ignored but this was just too huge not to share. It really gives a sense of how massive this thing is
     
  10. chrsmat71

    chrsmat71 I LIKE TURTLES!

    holy crap that is awesome...8 mm thick! and it's a lovely coin as well.

    don't drop it on your toes!
     
    shernan30 and stevex6 like this.
  11. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    I accidentally dropped it earlier putting it into a flip(not an easy task). Luckily it didn't damage it but the huge thud sent the cat running for his life.
     
    stevex6 and Jwt708 like this.
  12. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Beautiful , may I ask it's metal content ?
     
  13. Jwt708

    Jwt708 Well-Known Member

    @rzage Bronze. These coins are something else...like a rock. Well...red_spork's is anyway.
     
  14. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    Wow, the thick one is fascinating!

    How could such an anomaly have occurred? All other Ptolemy bronzes I've seen have an angled edge (obverse smaller in diameter than reverse). Presumably the flans were cast that way, maybe in an open-faced clay mold. So... how did this one coin end up so thick and without the usual edge shape?
     
  15. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    Is that a seam around the edge? o_O
     
  16. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

  17. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    I ALWAYS REALLY HATE to do this :mad: but I find the OP coin questionable on several grounds. I would send that one to David Sear to get his opinion as to its authenticity.
     
    swamp yankee and TIF like this.
  18. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    *yikes* ... TIF did kinda shine a light on an awkward detail, eh? (perhaps it should be sent to Sear's California ranch for a 2nd peek?)

    ... ro, I sure hope it proves to be a winner (it is an amazing specimen!!)
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2015
  19. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    I don't think it's actually a seam but a remnant of the lathe process used to machine these flans, see http://www.classicalcoins.com/flans1.html . There are also some marks on the reverse from the machining of the flan. The edge is definitely angled, just not nearly as dramatic as some I've seen.
     
  20. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    Unfortunately, I have other awkward questions to add.

    The Ptolemaics were quite specific about bronze weights, much more so than other cultures. The drachm-weight bronzes in Alexandria Series 5 come in at 68 grams, 42mm diameter. Variance is quite small. 65 grams is too light, and 39mm is too small for a drachm, and too large for the next lowest denomination, which comes in around 45g.

    As far as what appears to be a seam, Ptolemaic bronzes can naturally exhibit this feature, due to lathe-machining of the flans. But on examples where this feature is seen, the edges are always beveled, striated, and uneven, again due to the nature of the technology...

    latheedge.jpg

    Also, I find the style of the eagle quite crude, and out of line with Alexandria emissions, but the coin has been tooled, so perhaps the tooling has altered the original style.

    I would post this at FORVM, where you will find a handful of experts in Ptolemaic coinage. I am not one of them, and I hope I'm wrong.
     
  21. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    The owner of the website PtolemyBronze frequents Forvm. He is a very approachable guy. Perhaps you could email the site and ask for an opinion.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page