Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New two folles of Constantine I
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="gogili1977, post: 3027070, member: 86398"]I found on the Internet this explanation:</p><p>In the year 294 A.D., the four Tetrarchs initiated a monetary reform, replaced the 80 years old <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Antoninianus" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Antoninianus" rel="nofollow">Antoninianus</a> with new denominations, the most important of which were the solid silver <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Argenteus" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Argenteus" rel="nofollow">argenteus</a> and the large <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Billon" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Billon" rel="nofollow">billon</a> <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=follis" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=follis" rel="nofollow">follis</a>. I must tell you that these were, and are, pretty impressive coins; large, 28mm <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Diameter" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Diameter" rel="nofollow">diameter</a> weighting app. 10 grams, and with a beautiful shiny silver wash finish. They <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Still" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Still" rel="nofollow">still</a> had elements from the past: the <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Good" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Good" rel="nofollow">good</a> manufacturing technique, derived from the Aurelian's reform and the same metal as the <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Antoninianus" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Antoninianus" rel="nofollow">Antoninianus</a>, a mix of mostly copper, tin, and 3 to 5% silver. They were minted in huge quantities in no less than sixteen Imperial Mints. An interesting note is that even if one of the main purposes of these coins was to pay the large troops needed to defend the Empire, their portraiture rarely depicts the Emperors in a militaristic way. Most of the coins show a laureate <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Bare%20Head" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Bare%20Head" rel="nofollow">bare head</a>.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="gogili1977, post: 3027070, member: 86398"]I found on the Internet this explanation: In the year 294 A.D., the four Tetrarchs initiated a monetary reform, replaced the 80 years old [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Antoninianus']Antoninianus[/URL] with new denominations, the most important of which were the solid silver [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Argenteus']argenteus[/URL] and the large [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Billon']billon[/URL] [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=follis']follis[/URL]. I must tell you that these were, and are, pretty impressive coins; large, 28mm [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Diameter']diameter[/URL] weighting app. 10 grams, and with a beautiful shiny silver wash finish. They [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Still']still[/URL] had elements from the past: the [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Good']good[/URL] manufacturing technique, derived from the Aurelian's reform and the same metal as the [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Antoninianus']Antoninianus[/URL], a mix of mostly copper, tin, and 3 to 5% silver. They were minted in huge quantities in no less than sixteen Imperial Mints. An interesting note is that even if one of the main purposes of these coins was to pay the large troops needed to defend the Empire, their portraiture rarely depicts the Emperors in a militaristic way. Most of the coins show a laureate [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Bare%20Head']bare head[/URL].[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New two folles of Constantine I
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...