New Purchase- Standing Liberty Quarter/Post your own SLQ

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by HULLCOINS, Feb 18, 2012.

  1. HULLCOINS

    HULLCOINS Junior Member

    Thanks, that's why I bought it. I thought it had detail. I am neutral on the toning. It accents the coin nicely but I honestly wouldn't mind if it were blast white.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. kookoox10

    kookoox10 ANA #3168546

    Despite the grade, its still a great coin and I'm surprised that it's not a MS coin. I need one of these for myself.
     
  4. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    I'd give it an AU-58. Very nice one too.
     
  5. JRM43

    JRM43 New Member

    It sure is a beautiful 1917 Type 1. I'd put it as a 62. Mind telling us what you payed?
     
  6. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

  7. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

  8. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    Beautifully toned SLQ, WL!

    OP's coin is wonderful. I would rather have a PCGS 58 than an NGC 62.

    Here's one I sold a couple of years ago.
    Lance.

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
  9. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    brain fart 23456789975645432 + counting

    :)This one is toned just right!!! are you going to post the Grade??
    I see now were you posted Au-58
     
  10. HULLCOINS

    HULLCOINS Junior Member

    Great coins Lance and WL. Keep them coming. Here's another one I bought at the same time. 1928.jpg 1928 r.jpg
     
  11. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Absolutely not! Especially on a type one. Strike characteristics between the two types may be night and day, but claiming the presence of shield rivets can be used in assigning an MS grade is nonsense. A poorly stuck coin that lacks many rivets yet has full mint luster can easily grade a 63 or higher.

    "63++ or 64+"? What happened to plain old MS64?

    Although the coin appears to be quite clean, the given grade does suggest (as do the photos) light wear on the high points. The coin is quite nice but in no way did PCGS blow this one by 5-6 points. All said, the coin appears to be the slider that it was graded as.
     
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  13. LionelR

    LionelR Supporter! Supporter

    That's beautiful, ldhair!
    Spectacular piece, and thank you for showing it.
    -L
     
  14. HULLCOINS

    HULLCOINS Junior Member

    Ouch you just burned my 28. Great coin. Even though the 28 is fairly common, any SLQ with good strike is hard to find.
     
  15. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Actually, no. You are only partially correct. On type one coins, a good strike is the norm. Only on type two is it the exception.



    ldhair,

    The toning on your coin is rather unique. I've always preferred gritty toned coins such as this to the nauseatingly common white Standing Libs. Very nice, sir.
     
  16. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    Here's a really tough one in middle grades.
    Lance.

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
  17. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  18. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  19. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

  20. silverfool

    silverfool Active Member

    I'll second that, very nice coin. or it could 58. just can't tell from pics. I have to hold/tilt coins to check for that (maybe) bit of rub or wear. but I'll stay with 63
     
  21. Fall Guy

    Fall Guy Active Member

    Picked this one up pretty cheap. It's actually my first SLQ.
     

    Attached Files:

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page