New Purchase, Proof or Not

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by bear32211, Aug 19, 2020.

  1. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    A recent purchase of mind and fascinated at obverse and reverse. Is this a proof Morgan or Not ? Educate me and others, what to look for on these coins, if polished what are the signs to look for ? If you ask me, I say polished because of the surface around the letters.The details are crisp on both side. 96 m o p.jpg 96 m p 2.jpg 96 m p 3.jpg
     
    Legomaster1 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    Polished. Sorry.
     
  4. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    Heavily polished of which killed the value. I cringe when I see that abuse.
     
    bear32211 likes this.
  5. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    is the give away the surface around the letters ?
     
  6. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    That's one way, yes. But really it's the lack of original luster. That mirror finish over the whole coin is very obvious. Also, if you can see any wear on the coin that still is exactly the same (mirror finish) as the rest of the coin it tells you something is up. Sorry.
     
    Inspector43 and bear32211 like this.
  7. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

  8. mynamespat

    mynamespat Well-Known Member

    + the divot texture which is apparent in the last picture. This happens when metal is heavily worked on a buffing wheel.
     
    bear32211 and SorenCoins like this.
  9. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    Thanks for input so far, I then have this, original luster and bag marks ? Oh the '96 I paid 30. 84-o m o 1.jpg 84-o m r (2).jpg 84-o m e.jpg
     
    GenX Enthusiast and SorenCoins like this.
  10. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    yes, looks like original luster but a little baggy. Maybe MS62. It has that frosted, bone look.
     
  11. bear32211

    bear32211 Always Learning

    Bag marks are a pain in the butt but I got a bunch of these in all different dates, except, of course Keys.
     
  12. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    That seems high for a damaged coin, even with silver's recent run-up. If I were selling this to my guy at the local show, he'd put it in with the culls, and offer not much over melt. But with melt value above $21, you're not out much.
     
  13. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Your original coin was lightly polished. I say that because if they polished it too much, more details would have been lost. The residue (lack of shine) around the devices tend to identify it.
     
  14. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    bear32211 and GenX Enthusiast like this.
  15. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    +1 on the cringe!
     
    Randy Abercrombie and bear32211 like this.
  16. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    Ahh man... that’s a bummer on your 1896. But your 1885 is awesome!
     
    SorenCoins and bear32211 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page