Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New Probus to share with our CT coin club :)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1790359, member: 19463"]Unfortunately way too many dealers do not own or use the reference works they quote but find a similar coin somewhere and copy the information there without considering the minor differences in the coins that change the numbers, mint ID's or even rulers. Certainly there are hundreds of sellers who know their coins but at least as many have as little background in coins as our newer members here. I'm certainly part of the problem since I buy coins I want from sellers even if that seller is a complete fool. I do believe that those of us who can not look at a coin and understand why (why on this coin, not just that it is) an M is not a C or a Q an O would be well advised to avoid dealers who can not assist you to learn more about your coins while they are taking your money. There are plenty of good sellers. Learn from them while you patronize them. </p><p> </p><p>[ATTACH=full]288818[/ATTACH]</p><p> </p><p>I'm sorry I do not have an RIC 624 to show but I believe mine here is a 632 with the addition of PROBI to the reverse legend. The sharp eyed among you may say that it also has a captive at the foot of the horse and is from workshop B but neither of those facts are enough to change the RIC number. To RIC, it makes no difference that the officina number was listed in a Greek numeral (B=2) rather than Roman ordinal (2 would have been S for secundus, I believe, which would require some care to tell from the Greek numeral for 6 which looks like an S but is a bit more squiggly). I've not seen both from this issue together but hope I am not leading astray here (help, Martin, please). The shop letter could even be moved away from the XXI an placed up in the field according to the RIC listing and my coin would still be a 632. Example of 624 in field:</p><p><a href="http://probvs.net/probvs/R624/R624.260204.PG.JPG" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://probvs.net/probvs/R624/R624.260204.PG.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://probvs.net/probvs/R624/R624.260204.PG.JPG</a></p><p>I'm a bit more bothered buy both 624 and 632 listing the captive as "sometimes a captive at foot" so his presence or absence is not important enough for a new number either. </p><p> </p><p>RIC is the best book I own on these coin but that is not saying that it is any good. I realize there are other works I never bought in languages I never bothered to learn. My bad. There are websites of value:</p><p><a href="http://probvs.net/probvs/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://probvs.net/probvs/" rel="nofollow">http://probvs.net/probvs/</a></p><p> </p><p>My continuing song here is that catalog numbers are either important enough that you should buy the book and make an effort to get right or unimportant enough that you don't need them in a write up about the coin. The OP coin is a really nice specimen deserving of a proper identification at least NOT to include erroneous numbers copied from unreliable sources. I suppose most will say I am being too picky complaining that Probus here is not wearing a 'rad helmet' but a 'radiant crown'. If you are going to allow this spiky thing to be called a helmet, what will you call the ones where he has this crown on top of a visored and fancy metal hat? Traditional listings would call this a radiant bust (not using the word crown) 'in Imperial Mantle' (or sometimes 'Consular Robes'). This portrait highlights Probus as the leader of the civilian state. When he wears a helmet and wears armor, he is being shown as Commander in Chief of the armies. </p><p> </p><p>I wish I could afford to collect Probus. He has a thousand really neat coins from mints with distinctive styles. It is no wonder that his coins are so popular.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1790359, member: 19463"]Unfortunately way too many dealers do not own or use the reference works they quote but find a similar coin somewhere and copy the information there without considering the minor differences in the coins that change the numbers, mint ID's or even rulers. Certainly there are hundreds of sellers who know their coins but at least as many have as little background in coins as our newer members here. I'm certainly part of the problem since I buy coins I want from sellers even if that seller is a complete fool. I do believe that those of us who can not look at a coin and understand why (why on this coin, not just that it is) an M is not a C or a Q an O would be well advised to avoid dealers who can not assist you to learn more about your coins while they are taking your money. There are plenty of good sellers. Learn from them while you patronize them. [ATTACH=full]288818[/ATTACH] I'm sorry I do not have an RIC 624 to show but I believe mine here is a 632 with the addition of PROBI to the reverse legend. The sharp eyed among you may say that it also has a captive at the foot of the horse and is from workshop B but neither of those facts are enough to change the RIC number. To RIC, it makes no difference that the officina number was listed in a Greek numeral (B=2) rather than Roman ordinal (2 would have been S for secundus, I believe, which would require some care to tell from the Greek numeral for 6 which looks like an S but is a bit more squiggly). I've not seen both from this issue together but hope I am not leading astray here (help, Martin, please). The shop letter could even be moved away from the XXI an placed up in the field according to the RIC listing and my coin would still be a 632. Example of 624 in field: [url]http://probvs.net/probvs/R624/R624.260204.PG.JPG[/url] I'm a bit more bothered buy both 624 and 632 listing the captive as "sometimes a captive at foot" so his presence or absence is not important enough for a new number either. RIC is the best book I own on these coin but that is not saying that it is any good. I realize there are other works I never bought in languages I never bothered to learn. My bad. There are websites of value: [url]http://probvs.net/probvs/[/url] My continuing song here is that catalog numbers are either important enough that you should buy the book and make an effort to get right or unimportant enough that you don't need them in a write up about the coin. The OP coin is a really nice specimen deserving of a proper identification at least NOT to include erroneous numbers copied from unreliable sources. I suppose most will say I am being too picky complaining that Probus here is not wearing a 'rad helmet' but a 'radiant crown'. If you are going to allow this spiky thing to be called a helmet, what will you call the ones where he has this crown on top of a visored and fancy metal hat? Traditional listings would call this a radiant bust (not using the word crown) 'in Imperial Mantle' (or sometimes 'Consular Robes'). This portrait highlights Probus as the leader of the civilian state. When he wears a helmet and wears armor, he is being shown as Commander in Chief of the armies. I wish I could afford to collect Probus. He has a thousand really neat coins from mints with distinctive styles. It is no wonder that his coins are so popular.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New Probus to share with our CT coin club :)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...