Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rick, post: 95919, member: 1235&quot;]I think the real problem is entropy.&nbsp; There is no real algorithm to determine what &#039;normal wear&#039; is, because if you&#039;re talking about imaging at such a refined state that the softwear alone can determine grade designation with any accuracy, you&#039;re talking serious abnormalities that the software has to be programmed to assimilate.&nbsp; Then you can only allow for so much variation before the software can no longer determine between one grade from the next in sequence.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If you can get past that, which I think would be serious business, by itself, then you have the problems already mentioned.&nbsp; How can a computer software determine what is cleaned and what is circulated worn or corroded or otherwise intentionally damaged?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I would grant that computer imaging can be introduced to the process, if and when it is cost affordable, but I think we are a LONG way off from computers taking over the process entirely.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in