Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
New Mpc Pick Up Series 681 $10 in PCGS 68PPQ (Very Rare!)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="marv, post: 1029961, member: 27872"]I'm just going by what I've seen with regular large and small currency grading by PCGS/PMG. Anything 67 and higher has very miniscule differences. I just notice that your 68 note has more than a miniscule difference, that's why I was a bit surprised. Perhaps PMG is offsetting the margin issue based on other characteristics of the note. They do that of course. It's all a judgement call. IMO, these high (66 and higher) are really not meaningful. Your note would have been a "gem" and my note is a "gem" and would have brought the same money approximately. With this arbitrary differentiation between already gorgeous notes, are collectors really getting their money's worth by paying multiples for a 68 versus a 66? I don't think so, that's why I go by the old expression, by the note (coin) not the holder. For example, I just bought an Fr. 347 (1890 $1 fancy back) in a PMG 40 holder that faces up as an unc note. Folds are impossible to see unless one very carefully scrutinizes it via glancing light. However, I only paid $2000 for a note that would have cost triple in a 65 holder. I've seen other '40' notes that are much worse than my note, with very visible folds, dirt, etc., but they're in the same grade. So, in this case, I bought the note, not the holder. This is the kind of note that, in the past, would have been processed to "unc". Sorry to sermonize, I know the upper unc grades are here to stay, and, if you've got the money, it's one more way of saying "look at me...I've got something better than you have..." My primary consideration is the ability to admire the design, the engraving, and the color without having it obscured by bad folds, dirt, etc., so a 65/66 gives me all I need, or, like in the case with my 347, a top notch EF40.</p><p>Marv[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="marv, post: 1029961, member: 27872"]I'm just going by what I've seen with regular large and small currency grading by PCGS/PMG. Anything 67 and higher has very miniscule differences. I just notice that your 68 note has more than a miniscule difference, that's why I was a bit surprised. Perhaps PMG is offsetting the margin issue based on other characteristics of the note. They do that of course. It's all a judgement call. IMO, these high (66 and higher) are really not meaningful. Your note would have been a "gem" and my note is a "gem" and would have brought the same money approximately. With this arbitrary differentiation between already gorgeous notes, are collectors really getting their money's worth by paying multiples for a 68 versus a 66? I don't think so, that's why I go by the old expression, by the note (coin) not the holder. For example, I just bought an Fr. 347 (1890 $1 fancy back) in a PMG 40 holder that faces up as an unc note. Folds are impossible to see unless one very carefully scrutinizes it via glancing light. However, I only paid $2000 for a note that would have cost triple in a 65 holder. I've seen other '40' notes that are much worse than my note, with very visible folds, dirt, etc., but they're in the same grade. So, in this case, I bought the note, not the holder. This is the kind of note that, in the past, would have been processed to "unc". Sorry to sermonize, I know the upper unc grades are here to stay, and, if you've got the money, it's one more way of saying "look at me...I've got something better than you have..." My primary consideration is the ability to admire the design, the engraving, and the color without having it obscured by bad folds, dirt, etc., so a 65/66 gives me all I need, or, like in the case with my 347, a top notch EF40. Marv[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
New Mpc Pick Up Series 681 $10 in PCGS 68PPQ (Very Rare!)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...