Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paddy54, post: 2165015, member: 19250&quot;]Not quite sure what to make of this.....I received this e mail about 20 minutes ago.</p><p><br /></p><p>I regret that I must inform you that I am delisting the 1964 DDO-006 from the CONECA files.&nbsp; Additional specimens from varying dates and die states have surfaced.&nbsp; It was discovered that all had die clash marks and when overlays were made, the reverse design matched the doubled areas.&nbsp; I had questions originally, but was willing to agree with other attributers (John Wexler and Ken Potter) until more information surfaced.&nbsp; I have seen enough examples now for me to conclude that the doubling is the result of die clashing/abrasion and not from a doubled die.&nbsp; I know Ken is now questioning them.&nbsp; I am not sure what John&#039;s position is.&nbsp; I remain open, but until I see an example without die clashing, I will not be listing these in the CONECA variety files.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks,</p><p><br /></p><p>James Wiles[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in