Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2100481, member: 22331&quot;]I personally have sent lengthy PM to Doug requesting his objective posting on this subject.</p><p><br /></p><p>I personally am frustrated with posts as in &quot;PCGS Slab help (fake Morgan Slab??), where individuals without authorative identification profiles are stating assurance of a copy, without an objective resource.</p><p><br /></p><p>If one doesn&#039;t have an objectice source for substantiation of CLAIMS, it&#039;s believed that baseless opinions, are only fueling an analogous volatile flame of distrust. It&#039;s believed, and prominently advertised in &quot;search engines&quot;, that an industry with argumentive grading standards only have the TPG for authentification of originality.</p><p><br /></p><p>If these TPG can&#039;t publish authentification/slab standards, but numerous individuals in discussion sites can advance unsupported judgement STATEMENTS, what is to be trusted?</p><p><br /></p><p>I personally respect Dougs researched postings, and hope that others of like ilk will enjoin in posting objective subject</p><p>matter, pertaining to verification by slab serial numbers, and complete manner for determining slab authenticity.</p><p><br /></p><p>What will we have next, a MAD (made authentically determined) &quot;bean&quot; for our &quot;slabs&quot;?</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in